Bears Ears monument deserves protection | AspenTimes.com

Bears Ears monument deserves protection

I am adamant that the Bears Ears National Monument be restored, to the full breadth and width, given in 2016 by President Obama's Proclamation 9558 on Dec. 28, 2016.

Trumps proclamation 9681 on Dec. 4, 2017, has not been empowered by the Antiquities Act of 1906 or by section 320301 of Title 54, United States Code cited on page 58085, 4th paragraph, neither law gives the president the power to dissolve National Monuments.

The lawsuits, when fully heard, brought forward by the Sovereign Nations of the Ute Mountain Tribe, Navajo Nation, Uintah Ouray Tribes, Hopi Nation and Zuni tribes should put that point to rest.

These are also the tribes that put together the management plan for the Bears Ears Monument that is meant to protect their antiquities.

Five tribes, local citizens, state agencies and four federal agencies participated in a 6-year-long public process to discuss how to best manage this huge area that is full of fragile indigenous antiquities.

Then, in less than a year, with no more than a sophomoric rewrite of Obama's 9558 proclamation, Trump dissolved it. No discussions with the five tribes, local citizens, state agencies and four federal agencies that participated in the 6-years-long public process were held. Trump just cut the heart out of the local economy, ancient history and proper protections for our national treasure in the Bears Ears area with only four, weak WHEREAS's.

Recommended Stories For You

The premise put forward on page 85082 paragraph 3, that the area was not plotted as the smallest area that needed protecting, can only be said by someone who is unfamiliar with the richness of antiquities and vastness of the area.

Though it may be true that, according to the 1st WHEREAS on page 58085, the OBJECTS are protected, the sacred areas are not protected, unless under monument protection.

The 2nd WHEREAS postulates, with no proof, that this deletion is in the public interest. I would hypothesis the opposite, that the monument would preserve the antiquities treasure, improve the local economy, grant a more cohesive protection to the Bears Ears antiquities and preserve the trust of the tens of thousands of people that worked to make it a monument.

In summary:

The president does not have the authority to dissolve a monument.

The original monument is an appropriate size due to the richness it protects.

Even though the objects are protected in a mish mash-way, the areas are not protected, unless as a monument.

There was no public process with the 5 tribes or other agencies and stakeholders prior to the dissolution.

The trust with the people has been broken.

John Hoffman

Carbondale

Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.