Amendment 74 is bad for the community
October 5, 2018
More than 100 years ago, in the case Hadacheck v. Sebastian, the U.S. Supreme Court held that private property rights must yield to the good of the community. A reasonable economic use of all property must be available, but the highest and best use is not guaranteed by the Constitution. This is the foundation of land-use planning. Amendment 74 would reverse this and preclude any regulation necessary to address changed conditions and the public welfare. Even the enforcement of existing regulations would be at risk and dependent on judicial interpretations of the proposed amendment. Growth management, regulations necessary for the protection of the environment, the requirement that new development pay its own way, and other types of land use regulation would be jeopardized by Amendment 74. Based on my experience, land developers do pretty well without the need for a return on investment based on highest and best use to the detriment of the public interest.
Vote "no" on Amendment 74.
Trending In: Letters to the Editor
- Aspen Skiing Co. to take over family-run Gwyn’s High Alpine at Snowmass in 2020
- Pitkin County Courthouse ICE arrest likely a first
- Charges dismissed against driver in Basalt pedestrian death on Highway 82
- Aspen girl speaks out in video about alleged rape
- Judge sides with Aspen-Pitkin County Housing Authority in eviction case