The Palestinians’ history of rejections |

The Palestinians’ history of rejections

The international community should learn law before preaching to Israel. The U.N. resolution 242 is the key resolution concerning the Arab-Israeli conflict and was adopted by the U.N. Security Council on Nov. 22, 1967. It recognizes the need for Israel to have secure and recognized borders.

It demands an end to Arab aggression as a prerequisite for an Israeli withdrawal from some but not all territories seized by Israel as a result of the Arab aggression in 1967. The resolution doesn’t mention the Palestinians for the simple reason that the Palestinians had not been invented in 1967. It is therefore impossible for Israel to return Palestinian territories since there are none. There are disputed territories saturated with over 3,000 years of Jewish history that have been open for negotiations.

Demanding unilateral Israeli withdrawals before Arab aggression ends constitutes a fragrant violation of international law. It also rewards and encourages Arab aggression and blocks the path to genuine peace between Jews and Arabs.

The Arabs were offered what would have been the 23rd Arab state next to Israel in November 1947 and refused, while the Jews agreed and answered with war on the newly re-established Israeli state in 1948. The Palestinians were offered in 2000 by President Bill Clinton to Yasser Arafat and again refused, then launched the second intifada terror campaign. They again turned down statehood in 2008, which offered the Palestinians 97 percent in Judea and Samaria, which also would have given Israeli land and would have divided Jerusalem. If the Palestinians really wanted a state, why have they rejected every offer?

Jerome Marks


Support Local Journalism

Support Local Journalism

Readers around Aspen and Snowmass Village make the Aspen Times’ work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.

Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.

Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.


Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.

User Legend: iconModerator iconTrusted User

Letter to the Editor

Green-washing claim disputed

Steve Schechter’s May 12 letter to the editor indicates he doubts the claim of providing 100% renewable energy to the Aspen’s electric utility (“Green-washing in Aspen,” The Aspen Times). He provides a citation from Aspen’s…

See more