Shift focus on the most at risk | AspenTimes.com
YOUR AD HERE »

Shift focus on the most at risk

As each governmental agency throughout the Roaring Fork Valley has fallen in line in extending mask mandates, the article published in the Oct. 29 Wall Street Journal, “Masks are a distraction from the pandemic reality,” is eye-opening. The author, Dr. Joseph A. Ladapo, is an associate professor at UCLA’s David Geffen School of Medicine.

The entire article sites numerous science-based findings questioning the value of mask wearing, particularly outdoors. The concluding paragraph, “Until the reality of viral spread in the U.S. — with or without mask mandates — is accepted, political leaders will continue to feel justified in keeping schools and businesses closed, robbing young people of the opportunity to invest in their futures, and restricting activities that make life worthwhile. Policy makers ought to move forward with more wisdom and sensibility to mitigate avoidable costs to human life and well-being,” is enough to question the continued focus on the primary use of mask mandates over a sharper targeting of methods beneficial to those most at risk, and should be strongly considered.

Rick Gardner

Snowmass


Support Local Journalism

Support Local Journalism

Readers around Aspen and Snowmass Village make the Aspen Times’ work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.

Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.

Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.

For tax deductible donations, click here.
 

Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.

User Legend: iconModerator iconTrusted User


Letter to the Editor

Elon Musk > Greta Thunberg

|

What if all “activists” became entrepreneurs, and the propagation of division through fear-mongering no longer became a factor because the products created were better than what came before and therefore didn’t necessitate discussions of morality.…



See more