Shadow docket exposes high court’s political leanings
I have two simple problems with what the Supreme Court has done.
First, the plaintiffs in the Texas abortion case asked only for a temporary injunction. That sort of injunction is enshrined in the law as a means to keep the status quo while complicated issues of law and fact can be heard and decided. In the abortion case, the court itself recognized the underlying issues are extremely complicated, and that to make a decision would require a full presentation of all of the facts and arguments on both sides. Yet it denied the injunction, and that dramatically changed the status quo. We now have a whole new set of laws in Texas that did not exist before.
Second, whatever the court intended, its decision ended up looking very much political, not judicial. Enshrined in the Constitution is the idea that judges and courts are wholly independent from the president, Congress, and any political considerations. The courts are supposed to decide cases based strictly on the law and proven facts, not policy questions.
In the abortion case, even if all the justices thought they were adhering to those standards, the decision came across as hugely political. The ultimate result might be the same after a full trial of all the arguments and facts, but that won’t change the impression that the court now has a reputation for being in the same wrestling arena as the president, Congress and those who want to argue policy issues. That told all of us we can no longer consider the courts to be independent decision makers on matters that affect all of us. So much for trust.
Participate in The Longevity Project
The Longevity Project is an annual campaign to help educate readers about what it takes to live a long, fulfilling life in our valley. This year Kevin shares his story of hope and celebration of life with his presentation Cracked, Not Broken as we explore the critical and relevant topic of mental health.
Support Local Journalism
Support Local Journalism
Readers around Aspen and Snowmass Village make the Aspen Times’ work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.
Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.
Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.
Kudos to Laurine Lasselle for her well-written, well-researched article interpreting the data from the 2020 census (“2020 census data highlights relationship among resort communities, downvalley locales,” Aspen Journalism).