On SCOTUS and personal liberties | AspenTimes.com
YOUR AD HERE »

On SCOTUS and personal liberties

In response to Phillip Verleger’s letter regarding “The common good over personal liberties,” (The Aspen Times, Sept. 11) this is the same Supreme Court that sat in Cumming vs. Richmond (1899).

When three Black families in Richmond County, Virginia, faced the closing of the area’s only public Black high school, they petitioned the court to allow their children to finish their education at the white high school instead. It only took the Supreme Court three years to violate its own “separate but equal” standard by establishing that if there was no suitable Black school in a given district, Black students would simply have to do without an education.

In conclusion, I feel the precedent(s) set in your referenced (1904) court ruling are no more resolved now nor holding strong to modern challenges as they were perceived then. Personal liberties do hold legal value, and with a weaker modern Supreme Court, I can potentially see the legal challenges to this weigh heavy on the SCOTUS. Nothing was “resolved” in 1899 nor 1904.



P.S. — Get vaccinated.

Charles Bailey




Carbondale


Support Local Journalism

Support Local Journalism

Readers around Aspen and Snowmass Village make the Aspen Times’ work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.

Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.

Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.

 

Letter to the Editor

For the greater good

Totally disagreed with Brendan Berl’s Sept. 18 letter on public health rules (“Mask mandates are government overreach,” The Aspen Times“). It makes sense for local government to be fit and nimble when managing a pandemic.…



See more