Mulcahy case exposes APCHA’s lack of transparency |

Mulcahy case exposes APCHA’s lack of transparency

While it is understandable that both sides settled this case — the Mulcahys are exhausted and Aspen-Pitkin County Housing Authority is not interested in further investigation into their policies, practices and accounting — it is unfortunate; two aspects have not been addressed.

1) The risk to participants presented by APCHA: “The procedural violations that occurred in his case are serious ones that impact any citizens facing a potential regulatory action from APCHA. Lee’s case sets a worrisome precedent. As it stands right now, his case effectively sets the precedent that APCHA can violate its own regulations, then sue people in state court to enforce those improper actions, then disregard all of its procedural obligations in state court and still obtain an enforceable judgment depriving people of house and home. It has been an uphill battle but Lee has been fighting not only for his rights, but also to ensure APCHA is held accountable and that these same violations do not occur to other APCHA residents.” — “Regarding Lee Mulcahy’s case with APCHA,” guest commentary by Jordan Porter, Feb. 28, 2021, Aspen Daily News)

2) The risk to the greater community (all of us via county tax, city tax, building fees, participant fees, etc) which funds APCHA and its projects. The maximum sale price awarded the Mulcahys — how was that calculated? (Perhaps: The initial cost of building, minus the subsidies [which were substantial for this home], times the CPI at time of build, divided by the CPI at time of sale, minus subsidies for infrastructure annual costs. Perhaps not.)

I don’t know, it’s impossible to find out — but I do know that policies would be more clear and workable, and relations between participants and APCHA would be more functional, if the amount of subsidy into each home — and the home’s management and infrastructure — in each community is transparent throughout all phases and in all references.

Peg O’Brien

Woody Creek

Support Local Journalism

Support Local Journalism

Readers around Aspen and Snowmass Village make the Aspen Times’ work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.

Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.

Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.


Letter to the Editor

Cornerstone parents playing politics

Acting as the Board of Health, Eagle County commissioners did their duty by ordering a civil action against the Cornerstone School to comply with a school mask requirement for in-person education.

See more