Letter: No birth, no child
No birth, no child
In case people have been taken in by the obfuscation and misdirection, I want to point out that this year’s ballot contains an inappropriate question, because it is a religious one. The proponents of the ballot question are once again trying to have the state of Colorado enforce a religious belief on all its citizens.
The issue is abortion. In spite of the fact that the Supreme Court (in the 1973 decision Roe v. Wade) said that abortion is a private medical issue, certain religionists are still poking their noses into other people’s private medical affairs.
If a person believes that abortion is wrong, she should not have one.
If a person is a member of a religious group that says abortion is wrong, yet she has one anyway, it is still a private matter, between her and her god.
Participate in The Longevity Project
The Longevity Project is an annual campaign to help educate readers about what it takes to live a long, fulfilling life in our valley. This year Kevin shares his story of hope and celebration of life with his presentation Cracked, Not Broken as we explore the critical and relevant topic of mental health.
The most important question about this ballot question is: Why is the state of Colorado being roped into arbitrating a religious issue?
Why do religionists want to force all Colorado citizens to be anti-abortion?
The state is secular, and it should be. The state of Colorado should not be involved in a religious debate.
The state exists for all citizens: the sanely religious, the sanely non-religious, the absurdly religious, and the absurdly non-religious.
There shouldn’t be a debate – much less a ballot issue – about abortion, because the issue is no one’s public business, and it’s the private business only of the person who wants one.
Medically speaking, abortion is only between a woman and a doctor. Religiously speaking, abortion is only between a woman and her god. Socially and politically, abortion is not an issue at all.
When Mother Nature herself allows abortion – it’s called a miscarriage – why should thinking human beings who are already free to choose… be unnaturally disallowed from having one?
I never thought I would have to point this out in public, but for clarity’s sake, I will. There is no such thing as an “unborn child.”
The unborn is a zygote, an embryo, a fetus… in that order. And abortion is legal in the first trimester of a pregnancy. Until a pregnancy ends with a birth, there is no child at all. A “child” is why there’s a “birth” certificate, why there’s a “birth” day.
No birth, no child. It’s so simple, even an absurd religionist could understand it.
Support Local Journalism
Support Local Journalism
Readers around Aspen and Snowmass Village make the Aspen Times’ work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.
Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.
Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.
Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.
User Legend: Moderator Trusted User
With all the noise around testing Ms. Owens, I fear the real testing issues for our community, which impact our lives and livelihood, have been missed by one and all.