Colorado can’t afford reintroduction of wolves
I agree with Dee Malone that it is absurd that wolves will spread coronavirus, but it is equally disingenuous to claim they will “restore the balance” (“Fear mongering, COVID-19 and gray wolves,” letters, March 21, aspentimes.com). No studies have been conducted to determine if wolves will be successful or how they will affect deer and elk populations, which are reaching unsustainable numbers (not related to chronic wasting disease).
There is no evidence of elk overgrazing aspens or riparian areas on the Western Slope. In Biological Conservation, David Mech points out assumptions made in prior studies crediting wolves with a “cascade” of changes in Yellowstone. The tropic cascade is speculative at best. “Restore the balance” is a rallying cry because it polled well.
Less speculative is the risk reintroduction might have on open space. Everyone can observe the loss of agricultural lands to increasing sprawl. Ranchers live on a thin economic margin. Wolf predation could result in the sale of critical ranchlands, loss of the wildlife they support, and crucial connectivity to public lands for large mammals.
Montana spent $300,000 on compensation over 20 years. In the last three years, costs have increased $100,000/year with the expectation of spending $400,000 in 2021. As wolf numbers increase and the wolf population spreads to more areas, costs rise. In Montana, 83% of depredation occurs on private land. Because western Colorado’s ecosystem is made up of aspen and brush, it has less defensible space and likely more loss of livestock.
There is no funding mechanism on the ballot to conduct studies to actually undertake reintroduction or to provide continued management and compensation.
Wolves are here, giving Colorado Parks & Wildlife the opportunity to slowly create the best management plan possible, with a thoughtful process that will protect elk and deer herds, critical ranchlands, and wolves.
While coronavirus in wolves is not an issue, the virus is likely to bankrupt the state eliminating the possibility of funding for implementation and management of wolves.
Support Local Journalism
Support Local Journalism
Readers around Aspen and Snowmass Village make the Aspen Times’ work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.
Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.
Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.
Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.
User Legend: Moderator Trusted User
This is in response to Dan Perl’s letter in support of the Ascendigo proposed location in Missouri Heights (“Let’s stand behind Ascendigo”). It saddens me that Mr. Perl has not read the many letters written…