A call for civil debate | AspenTimes.com

A call for civil debate

North Korea’s nukes. Iran’s nukes. Chinese domination of the Western Pacific. Runaway government regulation and spending. Ballooning entitlements and public debt. Immigration. Extra-legal judicial and administrative actions. New Lift 1.

When I boarded the city bus recently and said to a neighbor, “I’m reading Grant’s biography,” guess what he said. Not, “how’s that book?” Not, “what do you think about (insert issue from above)?” Instead he spewed a verbal fusillade at President Trump (who wasn’t on the bus and whom I hadn’t even mentioned). Not about any substantive policy; my neighbor hates the president’s personal conduct.

I know a lot of people in Aspen like my neighbor. They’re (almost) uniformly great people; they’re uniformly politically unproductive. Personal attacks on a president, any president, make the haters feel great. But they’re lazy substitutes for substantive analysis and discussion. They don’t help solve even one of our many policy challenges.

I abhor much of President Trump’s proved and alleged conduct. But it doesn’t affect me personally. His administration’s actions do affect me. I applaud the ones who help me or the country. I criticize those who don’t.

Some locals have figured out it’s more productive to engage in civil, issues-based debate. More should do so.

Maurice Emmer


Support Local Journalism

Support Local Journalism

Readers around Aspen and Snowmass Village make the Aspen Times’ work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.

Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.

Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.