David Houggy: The case for STEM education
Imagine … the United States is a global economic and military superpower, leading the world in developing new industries, creating jobs, inventing new products and services, and breaking ground in all manner of scientific areas, including technology, biology, genetics, medicine, space travel and more.
We have figured out how to put a man on the moon and bring him back. We have a higher concentration of scientists and STEM (science, technology, engineering and math) professionals than any other country in the world — by a large margin. Our universities are unparalleled in the world, and our youth rank No. 1 in math and science among all developed countries. The economy is booming, growing at over 5 percent annually, we are exporting products and services all over the globe, and have a negative trade balance.
Is this a utopian fantasy? In fact, this was the state of affairs in the 1960s. Things weren’t perfect: Women and minorities were vastly underrepresented in STEM fields (and still are). But today the picture is different. The U.S. remains an economic and military power; however, we now have increased competition. Our university system continues to be the envy of much of the world, drawing international students in record numbers, but our own students aren’t doing as well. And the implications for America’s leadership in science, STEM fields, and jobs creation are not nearly as bright. STEM jobs are growing 1.7 times faster than non-STEM jobs, and are generally higher-paying.
• Only 16 percent of high school seniors pursue STEM careers.
• Of those, only 26 percent actually go into STEM jobs.
• U.S. students currently rank 38th out of 71 developed countries in math achievement and 24th in science.
• Women hold 48 percent of the jobs in the U.S., but only 24 percent of the STEM jobs. Minority students are likewise underrepresented.
• The number of U.S. citizens and permanent residents earning graduate degrees in science and engineering fell 5 percent in 2014 from its peak in 2008, while the number of students on temporary visas earning the same degrees soared by 35 percent.
There are many reasons for this change, most notably demographic and socioeconomic factors which have enabled the rise of a global economy and the emergence of other such nations such as Japan, China, Russia, India, South Korea and others. We are clearly in a more competitive environment now than we were in the ‘60s. Thus, it is all the more important that we actively develop an educated labor pool that is well-versed in the scientific method and STEM topics.
Our educators are working diligently to educate our youth; however, there is more to be done than can be fit into the school day. School curricula appropriately place greater emphasis on the basics of reading, writing and math than they do on science and the arts, in order for students to meet the benchmarks of a growing battery of standardized tests. Our teachers work long, hard hours, driven by their passion for teaching, often spending their own money to supplement school supplies. They need more support. Parents work multiple jobs and face more demands on their time, leaving less time for them to encourage youth to explore science.
And many adults themselves don’t fully understand the scientific process or how it works. They may even be skeptical or fearful of science.
Even in the best of circumstances, a great deal of learning has always taken place outside of the schools where students are free to explore and learn at their own pace, pursuing topics that strike their passions and spark their curiosity.
What is new is the competition for kids’ time; there are many more options today in terms of clubs, sports and after-school activities than ever before. In addition, many youth are responsible for taking care of younger siblings while parents are at work. And other youth have after-school jobs of their own, especially in lower-income families. Support for after-school programs is threatened due to budget cuts. There is less time for science, and less support for it, as well.
The U.S. needs more STEM professionals than we are currently producing. We also need a better-trained citizenry that is well-versed in critical thinking and the scientific method as a way of understanding the world. For the most part, our school system is very effective in providing academic instruction, but there remains a need for out-of-school STEM education that allows youth to explore their curiosities and passions at their own pace. This idea is core to Aspen Science Center’s mission, and we are actively creating programming (after school, evenings, weekends and summer) throughout the Roaring Fork Valley to serve this purpose.
These circumstances must be remedied, and at Aspen Science Center we are working hard to do just that. Please join us! Check out what we are up to at AspenScience Center.org.
David Houggy is executive director of Aspen Science Center.
Support Local Journalism
Support Local Journalism
Readers around Aspen and Snowmass Village make the Aspen Times’ work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.
Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.
Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.
Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.
User Legend: Moderator Trusted User
A recent federal report, by the agency in charge of rivers and dams, shows clearly that it is getting drier every year out there, and the American Southwest seems poised for a type of drought-driven,…