Wildlife impacts top list of Crystal River Trail doubts | AspenTimes.com

Wildlife impacts top list of Crystal River Trail doubts

Concerns about the already-stressed wildlife of the Crystal River Valley are at the forefront of objections to a proposed trail to connect Carbondale and Crested Butte.

Residents of the Roaring Fork and Crystal River valleys got a chance to air concerns and support for the proposed Crystal River Trail that Pitkin County Open Space and Trails is proposing. Residents filled the Third Street Center gym Tuesday evening for a joint work session of the Carbondale Board of Trustees, Pitkin County commissioners and Pitkin County open space board.

This connecting trail has long been contemplated by local governments, going back as far at 1994, said Gary Tennenbaum, director of the open space department. And the start of this trail, heading south from Carbondale up the Crystal River Valley, was extended about 5 miles in 2009.

After Gov. John Hickenlooper last year placed the Crystal Valley Trail on his “Colorado 16” list, Pitkin County Open Space was able to get money from Great Outdoors Colorado to do the first thorough environmental and engineering studies of the corridor for the trail project.

Pitkin County open space’s proposal includes two options for routes up McClure Pass, one that would stick next to Colorado 133 or one that would break away from the highway and utilize old routes like old wagon roads, railroad grade, social trails and existing roads. The county also may look to form some combination of the two.

While there were voices on both sides of the proposed trail, a great deal of opposition came out during the work session Tuesday evening. And similar themes were repeated by dozens of speakers.

The governor’s vision was intended to create the opportunity for every person to have access to the natural world, for their physical and mental health “but making a trail into the middle of nowhere with millions of tax dollars, I don’t know if that does it,” Sarah Johnson said.

Kate Hudson of the Crystal River Valley urged Pitkin County commissioners to fully evaluate the significant impact the trail would have on in-stream and riparian habitats of the Crystal River, “the heart and soul of our valley.”

Proponents of constructing the trail away from the highway pointed out that it will be much more expensive to build it alongside Colorado 133. Estimates are that constructing the Crystal Valley Trail away from the highway would be a $20 million project, while a trail adjacent to Colorado 133 would be closer to $100 million.

If it’s too expensive to build a trail up there that doesn’t encroach on wildlife habitat, then don’t build the trail, said Andy Wiessner of the Wilderness Workshop board.

Figuring heavily in this debate has been a letter penned by Kevin Wright, the former district wildlife manager of 31 years covering the Carbondale and Aspen districts.

“The dramatic increase in recreation and endless trail building is having significant negative impacts to wildlife. Impacts are often considered but are often dismissed as non-significant or believed they can be ‘mitigated,’” Wright wrote.

Wright said that “the most significant change in the last five to 10 years is the dramatic increase in recreational pressure.” He points to struggling mule deer and elk populations, as evidenced by falling fawn-to-doe and calf-to-cow ratios. “This is a very disturbing trend and is indicative that something is wrong or askew in the system. It is telling us that the populations are not healthy as some believe.”

“We are continually building more and more trails, placing these trails where there has never been trails and fragmenting the habitat, and placing more and more people where there were few before,” he wrote. “Wildlife has little places they can go to escape the pressures.”

“Development in the valley has been more detrimental to wildlife habitat than a trail would be,” said Doris Downey, who’s lived in Redstone for 20 years. “I think one can be protective of wildlife and still desire a trail off the highway.”

“If this is done right, all interests can be protected, including the flora and fauna that we care so much about,” one man supporting the trail said.

Some Crystal River Valley residents also criticized the process itself, saying that the trails eventual construction is being treated as a foregone conclusion.

Carbondale trustees were somewhat split in their support for the trail. And the town also is concerned about conflicts between the proposed alignments of the Crystal Valley Trail and Carbondale’s water-distribution main at Nettle Creek, which is the town’s primary water supply.

Tennenbaum said that the deadline for public comments has been twice extended. The deadline is now Nov. 15.

And even after that point, this proposal is far from finished. A draft plan that incorporates all the public comments is expected to come out in January, when discussion will go to the Pitkin County commissioners and Pitkin County Open Space and Trails.

Support Local Journalism

Support Local Journalism

Readers around Aspen and Snowmass Village make the Aspen Times’ work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.

Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.

Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.


Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.

User Legend: iconModerator iconTrusted User