Unenforced Colorado discrimination law could see end | AspenTimes.com

Unenforced Colorado discrimination law could see end

Kristen Wyatt
The Associated Press
Aspen, CO Colorado

DENVER – An unenforced discrimination crime in Colorado could be coming off the books in a bipartisan agreement inspired by a civil-unions bill.

A Senate bill introduced this week would remove criminal penalties for discriminating in places of public accommodation. Democrats and Republicans are sponsoring it together after discussions about a separate bill granting legal recognition to same-sex couples.

Republicans who oppose civil unions have questioned whether business owners could face jail time for refusing to serve gays and lesbians.

“By saying they don’t want to provide service to someone, they shouldn’t go to jail,” said Sen. Steve King, R-Grand Junction. King voted against the civil-unions bill for same-sex couples.

Democrats who support civil unions have insisted that because Colorado’s criminal statute for discrimination has never been enforced, its existence shouldn’t prevent support for civil unions.

One of the sponsors of the civil-unions bill, Democratic Sen. Pat Steadman of Denver, said opponents have repeatedly expressed fears that wedding planners or other business people could be tossed in jail for refusing to serve gays or lesbians. Formally removing the criminal section from Colorado law could ensure that couldn’t happen.

“No one has ever gone to jail for a day for this,” Steadman said Wednesday. Employment discrimination already is punishable only by civil fines, not jail, and Steadman said public accommodation policies should be the same.

“It’s taking a red herring off the table,” Steadman said of the repeal.

The civil-unions bill has passed the Senate and awaits consideration in the House. The accommodations discrimination bill awaits a hearing in the Senate Judiciary Committee. King and Steadman hoped for the public accommodations discrimination repeal would face little opposition.

“I think that law was passed in the 1800s. It’s never been used,” King said, “This can be handled in the civil statute and doesn’t even need to be in the criminal statute.”

Support Local Journalism

Support Local Journalism

Readers around Aspen and Snowmass Village make the Aspen Times’ work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.

Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.

Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.


Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.

User Legend: iconModerator iconTrusted User