Star Trek bold, but with some trouble |

Star Trek bold, but with some trouble

Christy LemireThe Associated PressAspen, CO Colorado
In this film publicity image released by Paramount Pictures, from left, Anton Yelchin as Chekov, Chis Pine as James T. Kirk, Simon Pegg as Scotty, Karl Urban as Bones, John Cho as Sulu and Zoe Saldana as Ohura are shown in a scene from, "Star Trek." (AP Photo/Paramount Pictures, Industrial Light & Magic) ** NO SALES **
AP | Paramount

J.J. Abrams hugely anticipated summer extravaganza Star Trek boldly goes to the past within the distant future of the Trek universe, years ahead of the TV series and the myriad movies and spin-offs it spawned.And in doing so, he and his longtime collaborators, writers Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzman, change everything you know or obsess about, if youre into this kind of thing about the kitschy pop-culture phenomenon.Its a daring and exciting approach thats sure to tickle and provoke purists, while at the same time probably cause neophytes to feel a bit lost.A major plot twist pops up which includes the arrival of Leonard Nimoy about halfway through the film, a twist that doesnt exactly work and from which the film never completely recovers.Having said that, Abrams clearly aimed to appeal to the broadest possible audience with this dazzling visual spectacle while also leaving plenty of Easter eggs for the hardcore fans to find. If theres any social or political subtext, as in the original series, its difficult to determine; this Star Trek seems solely made to entertain. Its an absolutely gorgeous film with impeccable production design the lighting is wondrous, almost heavenly and lovely, tiny details frequently emerge from within the larger, grander images.Abrams certainly puts on a good show between televisions Lost and the 2006 “Mission: Impossible” sequel he directed, theres no question the man knows how to stage an action sequence, and the opening gets things off to a thrilling start. He efficiently and satisfyingly presents the back stories of the men who will become Capt. James T. Kirk (Chris Pine) and the half-Vulcan, half-human Mr. Spock (Zachary Quinto) and puts them on a collision course with each other, which ups the excitement level early.Kirk and Spock, you see, werent always pals at least not in this revisionist history. This Star Trek pits them as opposites and adversaries until they must reluctantly learn to function side by side for the greater good. Kirk was a brilliant young hotshot causing trouble in rural Iowa, talented beyond his years but self-destructive nonetheless; Spock was a brilliant young math whiz whose mixed ethnic heritage made him the target of Vulcan bullies who were just as geeky as he was. Pine gets the womanizing and the ego of Kirk, but in a younger state theres also a likable boyish enthusiasm about him; Quinto, meanwhile, plays Spock as a little more tentative and less Zen-like. But maybe that sense of inner peace comes in time.All that informs their interaction once they join the Starfleet Academy and ultimately climb aboard the shiny U.S.S. Enterprise which looks familiar but has been significantly updated from 40 years ago. Among them are the usual cast of supporting characters: Communications Officer Uhura (the graceful Zoe Saldana, who gets more to do than Nichelle Nicholls ever did on TV); over-the-top Medical Officer Leonard “Bones” McCoy (Karl Urban, who gets to growl familiar lines like: Dammit, man! Im a doctor, not a physicist!); Chief Engineer Montgomery Scotty Scott (Simon Pegg in a lively bit of casting); reliable Helmsman Sulu (John Cho, showing he can do much more than comedy) and 17-year-old supergenius Chekov (Anton Yelchin, doing an intentionally cartoony Russian accent as an homage, even though he really is Russian).Their shared enemy is the angry Romulan leader Nero (Eric Bana, borrowing Mike Tysons elaborate facial tattoos), whose sharp, spiky ship resembles a malevolent version of Gaudis Sagrada Familia. The source of his vendetta against Spock, and the entire Federation, is revealed as the film progresses, and its a crucial part of that distractingly perplexing twist we mentioned earlier.Either youll go with it or you wont. Regardless, based on Abrams ambition and scope in rejuvenating the franchise, its clear it still has plenty of room to live long and prosper.

Star Trek, a Paramount Pictures release, is rated PG-13 for sci-fi action and violence and brief sexual content. Running time: 127 minutes. Two and a half stars out of four.

Support Local Journalism

Support Local Journalism

Readers around Aspen and Snowmass Village make the Aspen Times’ work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.

Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.

Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.


Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.

User Legend: iconModerator iconTrusted User


See more