Ruedi water study draws attention |

Ruedi water study draws attention

Donna Gray
Glenwood Springs correspondent
Aspen, CO Colorado

GLENWOOD SPRINGS ” Two proposed water studies are draw­ing attention from the Interbasin Com­pact Committee of the state Department of Natural Resources, which has said they could potentially harm established water rights.

The IBCC oversees the nine river basin roundtables created by House Bill 1177 to determine future water needs in each basin.

IBCC spokesman Rick Brown told the Colorado River Basin Roundtable Monday in Glenwood Springs that he felt consider­able “consternation” over the two studies, by Grand County and the Ruedi Water and Power Authority, to identify water needs.

Data compiled by those studies, such as actual in-stream flows and the amount of water necessary to maintain a viable and healthy river ecosystem, could be used in future legal proceedings or for regulatory purposes that would prove harmful to “vested water rights,” Brown said. “It’s a hugely important issue.”

Such an outcome would be contrary to the intent of HB 1177 not to impair previ­ously established water rights.

But a number of roundtable members argued the study in itself causes no harm.

“A study doesn’t diminish a water right [in itself],” only a regulatory body can make that determination, said round­table member and Kremmling Mayor Tom Clark.

Nor is it the intent to use such studies to cause harm. The intent of the Roaring Fork River study “is collaborative and cooperative,” said Ken Neubecker, who represents environmental interests to the roundtable.

“If you take the worst case scenario to its logical conclusion,” said Mark Fuller, executive director of the Ruedi Authority and roundtable member, every study or water project proposed by the basin round tables has the potential to impair someone’s water rights. “Everyone potentially violates the spirit of the legis­lation. And if it undermines the legitima­cy of [the grant projects], it undermines the whole [roundtable] process.”

John Redifer, a member of the Col­orado Water Conservation Board ” which grants funds for roundtable projects ” and representa­tive to the roundtable, assured the group that he supported the two studies and would make his support known to the CWCB. He said the problem also lies with HB 1177. “It’s very poorly written legislation.”

Brown also urged the group not to give up on the roundtable process, which involves people from all over the state with very divergent inter­ests. “Don’t be discouraged,” he said.

Ruedi Reservoir is located on the Fryingpan River, above Basalt.

Support Local Journalism

Support Local Journalism

Readers around Aspen and Snowmass Village make the Aspen Times’ work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.

Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.

Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.


Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.

User Legend: iconModerator iconTrusted User


Colorado River connectivity channel gets go-ahead after environmental assessment

Ten years after plans for a diversion route for the Colorado River around Windy Gap Reservoir outside of Granby was finalized, the project is a go. A consortium of state and commercial water entities announced Monday that in late June or early July, construction crews will begin excavating dirt from land adjacent to U.S. Highway 40, to fill in part of the existing reservoir and dredge a new path for the Colorado River to flow around it.

See more