Related seeks to suppress Sunrise notice of lawsuit in Snowmass property-selling case
The Aspen Times
The owner-developer of Base Village is seeking a court order that would go toward removing a legal notice on a piece of property it is trying to sell.
Sunrise Co. filed a complaint in February alleging that Snowmass Acquisition Co., the Related subsidiary now in control of Base Village, wrongfully terminated an agreement for Sunrise to purchase and develop a lot in Base Village. At the same time, Sunrise filed a “notice of lis pendens” alerting outside potential purchasers of its claims to the property.
Snowmass Acquisition is asking the court to issue an order requiring Sunrise to demonstrate why the lis pendens should not be invalidated.
A hearing is scheduled Tuesday in Pitkin County District Court. Negotiations over Base Village Lot 3 began in 2014. Snowmass Acquisition terminated the agreement in the fall, later announcing it intended to sell all of its remaining Base Village assets to Vail Valley firm East West Partners.
Those negotiations fell apart in December, and while the company says it has renewed its focus on the completion of Base Village, some members of the community believe it would still like to sell the property, pointing to the release of its other Snowmass assets (the Snowmass Center sold to Eastwood Developments Inc. in March; Related’s Mall assets have been listed with a real estate firm).
Participate in The Longevity Project
The Longevity Project is an annual campaign to help educate readers about what it takes to live a long, fulfilling life in our valley. This year Kevin shares his story of hope and celebration of life with his presentation Cracked, Not Broken as we explore the critical and relevant topic of mental health.
Sunrise’s suit accuses Snowmass Acquisition Co. of breach of contract, unjust enrichment and fraud, among other civil transgressions. It seeks a court decision requiring Snowmass Acquisition Co. to sell the property to Sunrise according to the conditions in the original letter of intent.
Snowmass Acquisition has responded by saying the letter of intent was non-binding and argues that the agreement could have been terminated “at any time for any reason before final transaction documents (were) executed,” according to a brief filed with the court. It is also arguing that Sunrise did not meet specific milestones set forth in their agreements.
Sunrise has said that some of the delays can be attributed to Snowmass Acquisition, and that the deal with East West went forward despite Sunrise fixing an issue that Snowmass Acquisition cited as its reason for termination.
Support Local Journalism
Support Local Journalism
Readers around Aspen and Snowmass Village make the Aspen Times’ work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.
Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.
Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.
Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.
User Legend: Moderator Trusted User
Business Monday briefs: Job-seeker service open throughout valley; renovated Limelight to reopen in November
Planning on getting back into the workforce or just switching up your career? The Glenwood Springs Workforce Center is offering mobile community office hours throughout the Roaring Fork Valley.