Pennies on the dollar: Effort to opt out of Vail Resorts settlement being organized
'Compensation offered is grossly insufficient'
By now, approximately 100,000 Vail Resorts employees and former employees have likely received “an email, two text messages, and a large envelope by mail from nine attorneys,” writes the creator of ResortSettlementOptout.com.
The site’s creator, allegedly an hourly employee from a Vail resort in California who otherwise wishes to remain anonymous, has a message for anyone who received the envelope, which contains a settlement offer from Vail Resorts.
“These attorneys urge you to opt-in to the settlement that they negotiated in the class action lawsuit Hamilton v. Vail … What happens when you opt-in? You get about $0.05 for every $1.00 Vail should have paid you. The attorneys get paid $4,366,666.67. And Vail laughs all the way to its next annual meeting, noting that it disposed of a potential cost of over $100,000,000 for $13,100,000,” the letter on the site’s homepage states.
‘Pennies on the dollar’
ResortSettlementOptout.com launched on Sunday and is meant to let Vail Resorts employees know they have the option not to take the “pennies on the dollar” offer being made to them on ResortSettlement.com, a website set up by the attorneys who have negotiated the settlement in Hamilton v. Vail.
“Even if only a few thousand of us opt-out, Vail will get the message,” ResortSettlementOptout.com states.
The writer allegedly received an offer of less than $100 on an estimated $2,000 in unpaid wages alleged by the plaintiffs attorneys, who claimed $108,000,000 in total damages for the 100,000 employees in the class before settling for 7.2% of that amount after fees and costs.
“It is not fair for us to get 7.2% of what the attorneys claimed we were owed while they collect millions,” ResortSettlementOptout.com states. “They conveniently arranged for $4,366,666.67 in fees and $50,000 more in cost reimbursement for their services.”
By opting out of Hamilton v. Vail, employees retain their right to pursue legal action against Vail Resorts in other cases.
“We do not comment on settlement details, and Vail Resorts believes the settlement is appropriate and fair,” Jamie Alvarez, director of corporate communications for Vail Resorts, said in a written statement provided to the Vail Daily in early October.
One such case is Quint v. Vail, a similar effort to Hamilton v. Vail, currently being pursued in Colorado. The Hamilton v. Vail case is taking place in California but cites violations of state labor laws in 16 different states where Vail Resorts operates. In total, there are 33 different violations alleged, including failure to pay for all hours worked and failure to pay overtime wages.
“If you opt-in to this case, you cannot later join Quint v. Vail,” ResortSettlementOptout.com states. “The settlement notice omits the fact that you may have another option if you opt-out. You might be able to join a case (Quint v. Vail) that is pending in a Federal Court in Colorado where Vail Resorts is headquartered.”
The opt-out effort could result in a dissolving of the settlement if 5% of the class opts out.
“If that happens, either these attorneys can start working for a living and negotiate a better settlement or they can drop their lawsuit,” ResortSettlementOptout.com states. “Maybe the Colorado attorneys can do a better job for us.”
At the Pitkin County commissioners’ work session Tuesday, the Community Office for Resource Efficiency’s CBMP presented an update to commissioners on work to address the methane after the county allocated $200,000 to the effort in March 2022.