Oil shale regs could affect Garfield County
RIFLE, Colo. The Bureau of Land Management released final commercial oil shale regulations on Monday, a move that some Democrats in Colorados congressional delegation recently sought to block.A U.S. Department of Interior official also signed a record of decision on Monday that opened up about 2 million acres across Colorado, Utah and Wyoming to commercial oil shale development.Those two actions will largely clear the way for the eventual leasing of 360,000 acres of the Piceance Basin, which stretches across portions of Garfield, Rio Blanco and Mesa counties and is home to one of the richest oil shale deposits in the world.But leasing wont come immediately, said Tracy Boyd, a spokesman for Shell Exploration and Production, which has three experimental federal oil shale leases in the Piceance Basin.In fact, it could take up to 10 to 12 years of additional research, environmental analysis and permitting before a company could develop a federal oil shale lease, Boyd said.There are people who say, There goes the BLM and the Bush administration on their drive to do a fire sale of commercial oil shale regulations before the end of the administration, Boyd said. There is nothing further from the truth. The regulations do not authorize leasing. It also doesnt set anything in motion that will lead to leasing. They just define the parameters under which eventual leasing will occur.The BLM actions on Monday set off a wave of protests among many environmental groups and state officials. Some environmentalists called the BLMs release of final regulations and signing of the record of decision a gift to the oil industry. Thats because those actions did not leave any avenue for a person or group to file an administrative appeal, they say.The final regulations will become effective on Jan. 17, according to the Federal Register.The Bush administration is maintaining an unlawful position by amending these resource management plans without providing the public with an opportunity to have their decisions administratively appealed, said Melissa Thrailkill, a staff attorney for the Center for Biological Diversity. We are considering all our options. That includes legal action in federal court.Many in Colorados congressional delegation also criticized the BLMs actions on Monday, especially the release of final regulations.Rather than completing the necessary research and development, the Bush administration is rushing ahead with rules for a development process they know little about, said U.S. Sen. Ken Salazar, D-Colo., faced strong Republican criticism this year for his efforts to block the issuance of final regulations. I am immediately concerned about the royalty rates that it has established. The administration is setting up Colorado to be sold short.But BLM Director James Caswell said oil shale is a strategically important domestic energy source that should be developed to reduce the nations growing dependence on oil from politically and economically unstable foreign sources.
The BLMs oil shale regulations call for a royalty rate of 5 percent for the first five years of commercial production. It will rise 1 percent each year until it reaches 12.5 percent, according to the BLM. Colorado will receive 49 percent of any revenues generated from oil shale development in the state.That rate is much lower than the 12.5 percent to 18.8 percent the government collects from companies harvesting conventional oil and gas on public lands.Salazar called the 5 percent rate a pittance. But Boyd, of Shell, said it was too high.That is not what we were hoping for, nor what we had proposed, Boyd said of the royalty rate. We were hoping for a lower rate that would be more conducive to get a startup industry off the ground.Boyd said the federal royalty is one of the key parameters to consider as it continues to invest in oil shale research.How could you assess the viability of a project if you do not know what your taxes will be? he said.
In the wake of the BLMs actions on Monday, Harris Sherman, executive director of the Colorado Department of Natural Resources, said state officials intend to review the new regulations with President-elect Barack Obamas new administration. He said oil shale may hold great promise to meet the countrys energy needs, but added that Coloradans dont have answers to serious questions about its development.Those questions include what technologies will be utilized, what is the cost of extraction, what are the likely environmental impacts and how they can be mitigated, Sherman said. But one of the largest looming questions about oil shale development would be its impacts on the states water, he said.Sherman also said the royalty rates set in the regulations could potentially shortchange Colorado and federal government of billions of dollars in revenues.
The Associated Press contributed to this email@example.com
Support Local Journalism
Support Local Journalism
Readers around Aspen and Snowmass Village make the Aspen Times’ work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.
Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.
Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.
Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.
User Legend: Moderator Trusted User
“We believe in the power of women, so we turned to what we know, winemaking, and tried to make our own small contribution to the discussion,” co-owner of Ponzi Vineyards Anna Maria said. “We had to do something.”