Luhn fires back
Once again, here comes Kernel Rice, that literary ankle biter and staunch defender of pederasty. It appears that Mr. Rice condones the spectre of priests humping little boys and is irate that I favor the opposing viewpoint.
Does this mean that you are an aficionado of pederasty? Will you kindly get your thumb out of your mouth and answer me for once, my dear fellow?
Being upset with the conduct of certain members of the priesthood does not necessarily mean that I’m obsessed with homosexuality as he so stated in his letter.
Furthermore, there’s a companion issue here that has great significance as well. This being that these men of the cloth have made a mockery of the bond of trust placed in them by their congregation, and I don’t know if there’s enough money in the world to sweep this outrage under the rug.
To wind it up, I write about plenty of things besides homosexuality and its variant form, pederasty. Jonathan should cut back on his letter writing until he can show marked improvement.
Meantime, I’ve got plenty more crow for him to ingest, being that he seems to have developed quite an appetite for it.
Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.