Locals need more housing opportunities
Why more “employee” housing units? I think we need local housing for those retiring and others otherwise unable or unwilling to buy into the current employee-housing or free markets. We need a level of housing between the two – a product that offers units where local owners can do some or all of the following:
• Work fewer than the 1,500 hours a year required for employees
• Rent their unit for up to a specified number of months per year
• Buy a unit with as many bedrooms as they want and can afford
• Rent rooms
• Upgrade their units at their own risk, and the market (not the government) will decide if their upgrades were worth it
• Leave to their resident qualifying heirs
• Sell to a locally qualifying buyer for as much as they can get. Yes they, like current affordable housing, risk prices going down. There is no “no-risk” solution to buying real estate
We already have 2,000-plus employee units in a community of 5,000 to 10,000 people. I encourage the city and county decision-makers to add units to the local real estate market that will expand the deed-restricted program and provide greater opportunity for those in it and a broader spectrum of those on the outside looking in. The goals should be to see Aspen be a better and more fulfilling and sustainable multigenerational community and to find opportunities that will give our kids and other aspiring lifelong Aspenites a chance to live, prosper and retire in Aspen.
A prosperous local population strengthens the local economy and community. Housing for the rich? What’s wrong with helping to create richer locals?
Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.