Ross lawsuit against city of Glenwood Springs dismissed | AspenTimes.com

Ross lawsuit against city of Glenwood Springs dismissed

Matthew Bennett
Glenwood Springs Post Independent
A few patrons walk through the Glenwood Springs Mall, which has struggled to keep tenants for years, with most of the store fronts empty.
Kyle Mills / Glenwood Springs Post Independent

Ross Dress For Less’ lawsuit against the city challenging its implementation of an Urban Renewal Authority at the Glenwood Springs Mall has been dismissed.

In the ruling, 9th Judicial District Court Judge Denise Lynch “dismissed the amended complaint in its entirety with prejudice,” according to a recent city statement.

A statement prepared by real estate communications group ReComm Global on Ross’ behalf stated that Ross strongly disagreed with the court’s decision.

“The city passed two resolutions declaring the Glenwood Springs Mall blighted and forming a taxpayer-funded Urban Renewal Authority to help the mall owner, Frank Woods, get out of his contractual obligations to Ross that have been in place since 2012,” the statement read. “Ross maintains that the city’s use of governmental power and taxpayer money to enable the mall owner’s attempt to breach its contract … with Ross is abusive, unfair and contrary to Colorado law.”

The statement also alleged “Ross was never given notice of nor an opportunity to be heard at the hearings before the City Council on the resolutions despite Colorado law requiring such notice.”

At the Dec. 6 City Council meeting, councilors in consecutive 6-0 votes approved two Urban Renewal Authority Resolutions. The first found that one or more blighted areas existed in the city and the need for the redevelopment and rehabilitation of those areas in accordance with Colorado Urban Renewal Law. The second approved the West Glenwood Springs Urban Renewal Authority Plan.

That plan, prepared by Denver based real estate advisory firm Ricker Cunningham for City Council found that the primary mall building was “approximately 90% vacant, compared to the citywide commercial vacancy rate of 3%.”

Additionally, the report concluded that the lease agreement between the mall and its anchor tenant Ross Dress For Less extended “extraordinary control” to Ross, which made “it all but impossible” for Woods to freely manage the mall properties.

“The city is pleased with the court’s decision as it paves the way for the city, the URA, the mall owner and tenants to work together on revitalizing not only the West Glenwood Mall but the whole neighborhood,” City Manager Debra Figueroa stated following the ruling.

ReComm Global however asserted, “Ross will appeal the District Court’s decision and is currently assessing additional legal options to address Glenwood Springs’ governmental interference with its private contractual and property rights.”

mabennett@postindependent.com


Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.