RFTA ponders how to sell voters from Aspen to New Castle on possible property tax
RFTA isn’t certain yet if it will seek a property tax from voters in November to support the local bus system, but if it does it’s got a catchphrase to help sell the idea.
Consultants told the RFTA board of directors at their monthly meeting Thursday that something catchier must replace the Integrated Transportation System Plan — the name of the blueprint for keeping the bus system healthy and growing over the next 25 or so years.
Consultant Bill Ray of WR Communications said a “messaging” committee met recently to kick around ideas for a tagline for the possible RFTA campaign. The favored slogan was: “Destination 2040: Our region’s future is riding on RFTA.”
The tagline plays off the idea that getting people out of their personal vehicles and into mass transit is vital for mobility in the narrow valley served by one primary artery.
RFTA board members agreed it would be tough to excite voters about something called the Integrated Transportation System Plan. They had a few suggestions about the tagline but generally expressed support.
“It’s clever,” Basalt Mayor and RFTA board member Jacque Whitsitt said.
RFTA depends on a sales tax collected in member towns from Aspen to New Castle as well as Pitkin County and the Roaring Fork portion of Eagle County. In addition, it collects fares and has traditionally reaped state and federal grants. The grants are largely drying up, so RFTA commissioned a study to determine how much money will be needed to cover everything from replacing aging buses to expanding service to meet growing needs.
Work headed by Parsons Transportation Group identified tens of millions of dollars of capital projects the bus agency needs to pursue over the next 30 years.
A property tax of between 3 and 5 mills is being contemplated to pay for future service and capital improvements. A property tax hike of 5 mill would raise an estimated $17.5 million annually while 3 mill would raise $10.5 million annually.
“At 5 mill, there’s enough to fund the whole enchilada, essentially,” said Ralph Trapani, an executive with Parons and a former CDOT engineer who oversaw construction of Interstate 70 through Glenwood Springs and widening of Highway 82 in the Roaring Fork Valley.
A property tax increase of 3 mills probably wouldn’t cover all of RFTA’s needs, Trapani said. That assumes the agency must provide funding for about 68 percent of all its capital improvements over the next 30 years.
RFTA conducted a survey of likely voters in the region earlier this winter and found that while there is solid support for the agency, approval of a ballot question isn’t a slam dunk.
A series of public outreach meetings and consultations with elected officials are planned in April to provide information and gauge reactions to the tax concept. RFTA’s board of directors will digest the information at a retreat in May and likely determine in June if a ballot question should be pursued in November. If so, ballot language would have to be set by late August.
Support Local Journalism
Support Local Journalism
Readers around Aspen and Snowmass Village make the Aspen Times’ work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.
Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.
Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.
Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.
User Legend: Moderator Trusted User
The Pitkin County Restaurant Alliance got an order it didn’t want Friday — a judge’s denial of its motion for a temporary restraining order that would have halted the county’s Red phase that takes effect Sunday.