Judge not ready to make Mulcahy sell Aspen home
A judge is holding off the enforcement of his previous court ruling ordering an Aspen man to sell his taxpayer-subsidized house at Burlingame Ranch because the matter now hangs in the balance of the U.S. Supreme Court.
Pitkin County District Judge Chris Seldin on Tuesday issued an order denying the Aspen-Pitkin County Housing Authority’s motion asking to him to enforce an earlier judgment that Lee Mulcahy sell his house.
Seldin’s one-page order suggested his court would be abusing its discretion were it to lift the stay because Mulcahy is attempting to take the matter to the nation’s highest court, which appears to be his last legal resort to keep his home.
“APCHA’s argument for dissolving the stay is one of degree rather than kind; it argues Mulcahy’s path on appeal has significantly narrowed in light of the action by Colorado’s appellate courts,” Seldin’s order said. “The Court agrees, but the United States Supreme Court still has appellate jurisdiction over this Court. Given the unique facts of this case — Mulcahy built the house himself — and the irreparable injury involved, the Court declines to lift the stay.”
APCHA attorney Tom Smith and its executive director, Mike Kosdrosky, were not working this week and unavailable for comment. However, city of Aspen Attorney Jim True said, “I think there’s no question at this point that APCHA has to wait. The judge made it clear that he wouldn’t lift the stay, and there’s nothing (APCHA) can really do at this point.”
Mulcahy has said that with or without the court order’s enforcement, he has no intentions to leave his home, which he built after winning the housing lottery. Mulcahy paid $150,000 for the undeveloped lot in October 2006, later constructing a 3-bedroom, 31/2-bathroom, 1,912-square-foot home in 2012, according to property records.
APCHA sued Mulcahy in December 2015 on allegations that he failed to meet the housing authority’s ownership requirements of working 1,500 hours a year in Pitkin County.
In June 2016, Seldin ruled in APCHA’s favor and ordered Mulcahy to put up his home for sale, but the ruling was not immediately enforced because Mulcahy took the case to the Colorado Court of Appeals. The appellate court upheld Seldin’s ruling and, on April 30, the Colorado Supreme Court declined to hear the case.
Mulcahy has since taken steps to have the U.S. Supreme Court review his case.
On July 23, Justice Sonia Sotomayor granted Mulcahy’s application to file a petition for a writ of certiorari no later than today. A petition for a writ of certiorari essentially asks the higher court to review a lower court’s decision.
According to the Supreme Court’s blog, “Of the 7,000 to 8,000 cert petitions filed each term, the court grants certiorari and hears oral argument in only about 80. Granting a cert petition requires the votes of four justices.”
Denver attorney Jordan Porter is representing Mulcahy in his federal complaint against APHCA. That lawsuit claims APCHA did not give Mulcahy the required 60 days to demonstrate he was complying with housing regulations after APCHA warned him in July 2015 that he had run afoul of them.
Porter is not part of Mulcahy’s bid to have the Supreme Court hear his case. Porter said it typically takes the Supreme Court six weeks to determine whether it will review a writ cert.
Support Local Journalism
Support Local Journalism
Readers around Aspen and Snowmass Village make the Aspen Times’ work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.
Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.
Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.
Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.
User Legend: Moderator Trusted User
A report released this month by the Center for Colorado River Studies says that in order to sustainably manage the river in the face of climate change, officials need alternative management paradigms and a different way of thinking compared with the status quo. Estimates about how much water the Upper Colorado River Basin states will use in the future are a problem that needs rethinking, according to the white paper.