Aspen’s housing authority taking stock of homeowner association bank accounts
The local housing authority plans to take a roll call of homeowners associations within the system to see if they comply with state laws and whether they are deficient in funding their capital reserve accounts before the government potentially bails them out.
That is the direction the Aspen-Pitkin County Housing Authority board gave to staff last month. It’s a policy that is meant to help resolve HOA deferred maintenance and capital reserve funding problems among the 1,600 deed-restricted units that are individually owned. A 2012 assessment estimated a $15 million shortfall of capital reserves across the inventory, or roughly $9,000 a unit.
Last year, city of Aspen officials proposed giving each unit $10,000, either through loans or grants. The funds would go in the escrow accounts of homeowners associations and pay for capital improvements to common areas such as work on roofs, sidings and boilers, among others.
But before that happens, APCHA wants a better idea of how many HOAs are out there, and then assess their capital reserve funding levels so the agency can educate them about legal fiduciary responsibilities under state and local laws.
“Before we start throwing money at this, let’s assess and reach out to every HOA in the system,” APCHA Executive Director Mike Kosdrosky said.
APCHA will let homeowners know they can get third-party legal assistance if they work with the agency in providing the information it’s seeking.
“This is all about using the carrot now with the understanding that the stick will be pulled out” if homeowners don’t cooperate, Kosdrosky said.
APCHA also will help HOAs conduct or update their capital reserve studies.
The problem has been lingering for years, and officials acknowledge there is no quick fix. What’s at issue is that owners of deed-restricted units have no financial incentive to put money into their buildings if there is a sales cap on them, City Councilman Adam Frisch said.
“The reason a lot of HOAs are behind is because we are asking them to put money into something that they aren’t going to get back,” he said, adding he doesn’t believe it’s a matter of educating homeowners. “You want to encourage people to be economically rational and we are telling them not to be.”
Kosdrosky said the first step in tackling the issue is knowing how many HOAs there are, how much money they have and the condition of the buildings.
“Everyone wants to talk solutions,” Kosdrosky said, “and we don’t even know the problem.”
Frisch said the assessment from 2012 looked at 20 HOAs within APCHA, which is significant. He, along with city and county officials, have tried to work on the issue for the past year but are at an impasse.
“Until enough people agree on what’s causing the problem,” he said, “we won’t get to a solution.”
Support Local Journalism
Support Local Journalism
Readers around Aspen and Snowmass Village make the Aspen Times’ work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.
Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.
Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.
Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.
User Legend: Moderator Trusted User
While vaccine booster eligibility criteria can seem complicated on paper, in practice what the state and federal authorities are essentially saying is that anyone who thinks they need a booster dose should get one provided enough time has passed since their initial doses or doses.