Aspen sorting out the future of its recycling center
As Aspen officials ponder how to keep the popular Rio Grande Recycling Center open for as much as $350,000 a year, they are taking suggestions from the public on how to do it.
More than 200 individuals have weighed in both online and in person with city officials at the recycling center and other locales around town, said Liz O’Connell Chapman, the city senior environmental health specialist.
“Before we go around spending money, we want to ask taxpayers what they think,” she said.
That’s because the county is now requiring all residents within its jurisdiction to pay for curb-side recycling.
The city has required haulers to have curb-side recycling services since 2005, but for unknown reasons it hasn’t been used as much as officials thought it would.
“We do not have the participation rate we had hoped for,” O’Connell Chapman said, adding education and outreach is necessary to increase usage. “There is a huge missed opportunity in the curbside recycling realm in Aspen.”
Last year, it cost the county $250,000 to have Waste Management haul recyclables from the Rio Grande center.
O’Connell Chapman said after speaking with the two haulers that the city could contract with in the future for the same service, it became clear that cost could go as high as $350,000 annually.
A less expensive option that is popular with many users who have taken the city’s survey on http://www.aspencommunity voice.com is going to target recycling in which specific recyclables are collected separately.
Currently, the Rio Grande center operates as a single-stream collector where plastic, paper, metal and other materials are combined.
It’s also the most expensive option, O’Connell Chapman noted.
Between 150 and 200 people use the center every day, and over a four-year stretch, just over 4,000 tons of material have been diverted from the local landfill.
The city has a 29 percent diversion rate, 2 percent of which is composting. The state of Colorado has an 11 percent diversion rate for recyclables going into the landfills.
The city is in the middle of its public outreach campaign to get feedback, which will shape officials’ recommendations to Aspen City Council on how to move forward.
The city is asking people to take the survey online, which asks 10 questions about their opinions on recycling and requests additional comments.
Also on the website is a community forum for people to make comments in a public setting. Although only eight people have weighed in, they are in favor of the recycling center staying.
“Recycling and composting needs the subsidy, support and leadership from the city and county to be effective and viable,” wrote one user. “The recycling center is used by hundreds upon hundreds of people and cannot be replaced with mandatory at-home pick up. With recycling and composting, every citizen can participate, our community leaders can help lead and support the effort.”
Another supporter wrote that it is money well spent.
“We pay plenty of property and sales taxes to the city of Aspen; $150K to 300K per year is a very small percentage of the overall budget,” he wrote. “Aspen is supposed to be a leader in environmental sustainability. Closing or relocating the RGRC is not demonstrating leadership.”
O’Connell Chapman said the city will take comments until the end of the month and the best way to do that is on http://www.aspencommunityvoice.com.
There are several documents and other informational items available there for people to look at to help them craft an informed opinion.
City staff also will be on site at the recycling center from 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. today to answer questions.
“We will present that information to council this summer,” O’Connell Chapman said, adding the environmental health team will wait until a new City Council is seated in June. “This is such a big issue.”
Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.
Basalt High School choir director Brittany von Stein made her first court appearance Wednesday for advisement on the criminal charges filed against her for alleged sexual relations with a student. The criminal case was sealed by a judge’s order so limited information was available.