It’s the lights, stupid
Dear Editor: It is true that there are simply too many vehicles coming into Aspen. It is also true that bottlenecks such as the S-curves contribute to the problem. However, what is most remarkable is that there is no discussion of the problem with traffic lights on the stretch between Aspen and the AABC. There are five stoplights in the one-and-one-half mile stretch; that is dense even by urban standards. Some thought and study ought to be directed towards to influence on traffic of those five independently cycled traffic lights.It occurred to me that many of the people who are responsible for “solving” this problem may not in fact participate in the commute on a daily basis. I wonder if they ever even leave Aspen. If they did, it would be eminently clear that the cycling of the Truscott light to allow a single car to enter Highway 82 wreaks more havoc on the traffic flow than the roundabout or the Buttermilk merge. This applies also to the Owl Creek light, which interrupts Highway 82 on a nearly continuous basis, merely to let a single car or small group in. Meanwhile, the inane light at Harmony Lane is redeemed only by the infrequency of its activation.With 25,000 vehicles per day, the sad reality is there will be no “magic bullet.” However, given that the city’s “S-curve Demonstration Project” defines the boundary of its study area as ending at Cemetery Lane, this gives credence to the critique that Aspen residents never go further downvalley than the roundabout. Whatever solutions might be available to lessen the problem, it will require a mindset that thinks outside the boundaries of downtown and beyond the obsession with the S-curves.Malcolm McMichael Carbondale
Support Local Journalism
Support Local Journalism
Readers around Aspen and Snowmass Village make the Aspen Times’ work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.
Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.
Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.
Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.
User Legend: Moderator Trusted User
The blizzards of January and February seem like distant dreams to Colorado water managers. What started as a promising year for water supply — with above-average snowpack as of April 1 — ended Sept. 30 with the entire state in some level of drought.