Is this correct?
I’m trying very hard to get this all straight.
The SVRA fails to do an adequate job of marketing our entrepreneurial, for-profit, private resort. It is relinquishing that job, turning it over to our town government. Is this correct?
The town government proposes to pass a 2.5 percent sales tax, communitywide, for the purpose of marketing the private enterprises and activities within the resort. Is this correct?
An allegedly independent board composed of three commercial entrepreneurs and two at-large representatives is to be set up to administer a $2.5 million annual marketing effort.
This board is to be nominated by businesses and residents, and confirmed by the Town Council. Is this correct?
Now the properties to benefit from this tax and the marketing effort are, presumably: The Aspen Skiing Co., The Timbers Club, the real estate fraternity, the lodges, the restaurants, and the merchants.
Does this seem correct?
My next question is: Who among these entities has stepped forward to help fund the proposed marketing effort, which will, of course, rebound to their benefit?
While this tax has been proposed and discussed, the Skico, for one, is building a completely new, $7.5 million golf course. It is also adding multi-million-dollar lodging facilities at its Snowmass Club. The Timbers is also building its own multi-million-dollar club.
These properties are being sold at a profit by our real estate interests, who garner a healthy commission on each transaction. Have I got it all straight so far?
This brings up my next question: Is it the consuming public’s responsibility to foot the bill for a marketing effort put forth to ensure the success of our town’s private enterprises?
Other questions: Has the town government approached the private interests for help in the funding of these marketing efforts? If not, why not? Is the cost really being passed onto our guests, our residents and the whole valley?
I guess I need reliable answers to these questions before voting. Please straighten me out in these quandaries of mine.
Oops, a further question just occurred to me: Are we being offered $50 per resident for our votes in order to tax ourselves to the tune of 2.5 million smackers ? without being told how, where and for what specific purposes even one single dollar of this is to be spent?
Support Local Journalism
Support Local Journalism
Readers around Aspen and Snowmass Village make the Aspen Times’ work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.
Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.
Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.
Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.
User Legend: Moderator Trusted User
The future of the Aspen-Pitkin County airport took a significant step forward Thursday. Pitkin County commissioners decided 4-1 to accept the recommendation of a community-based committee and leave the runway where it is, a bedrock decision in the long process toward a new terminal and airfield.