IRV much worse than old runoffs |

IRV much worse than old runoffs

Dear Editor:

A recent letter to the editor “IRV better than old runoffs” by Terrence Bouricius of Burlington, Vt., made several misstatements of fact.

Voters expect a voting method to be monotonically increasing, in that a vote for a candidate will always increase, rather than decrease, that candidate’s chance to win relative to other voters’ votes. All plurality elections, including primary, general, and top-top runoff elections are provably monotonically increasing, and a voter always knows that a vote for a candidate will help that candidate to win. On the other hand, in IRV/STV elections a voter never knows whether ranking a candidate first, last, or not at all will help that candidate to win or instead cause that candidate to lose, turning the act of voting into a gambling game.

Terrence claims that “Burlington, Vt., has used IRV with great success” yet a recent Burlington election eliminated the most popular moderate candidate and elected an extremist. The Burlington election also exhibited non-monotonicity because if some voters had decreased their vote for a candidate, then that candidate would have won the election instead of losing. IRV/STV favors extremists over moderates.

IRV is a fundamentally inequitable, costly, complex method for counting votes that causes many more problems than it solves. For instance, IRV does not solve the spoiler problem except in cases when the “spoiler” has virtually no chance to win, and does not find majority winners because many voters’ ballots are exhausted prior to the final counting round.

For more about the realities of instant runoff voting counting methods, see the IRV page on or for precise refutations of Terrence’s claims see or

Top-two runoff elections are superior to the IRV method of counting votes in virtually every way. Also, many other alternative voting methods are available that are fair and simpler than IRV. Many of these fair, simpler alternatives also use rank choice ballots, and some use approval or ratings. IRV/STV does not treat all voters’ ballots equally, and this causes many problems, including non-monotonicity.

Kathy Dopp

executive director, US Count Votes

Park City, Utah

Support Local Journalism

Support Local Journalism

Readers around Aspen and Snowmass Village make the Aspen Times’ work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.

Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.

Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.

For tax deductible donations, click here.

Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.

User Legend: iconModerator iconTrusted User