Harvey Mackay: Feedback must be immediate
When Jack Canfield, author of The Success Principles, gives a training session on feedback, hell recruit a volunteer from the audience. The job? Steer Jack, who is blindfolded, to walk up to the volunteers spot in the auditorium. Step after every step, the volunteer utters up just two words: on course or off course. The audience notices two things: Had Jack been told he was off course more often, he would have reached his goal faster. But even so, Jack always gets to the right spot because hes continually taking action and constantly adjusting to the feedback. For half a century, the annual performance review has been one of the most elaborate rituals in business. Weeks are spent in preparation. Employees haul in reams of documentation. Managers orchestrate scripts to telegraph messages. Is a warning notice or firing in the offing? The personnel department blesses every comma. Not exactly snappy, constant or fast-acting feedback.The tradition of the annual performance review is under siege. Not extinct, the annual review has become a confirmation, not a revelation. The Wall Street Journal recently ran a piece on how youthful Generation Y employees are revamping reviews. Gen Yers, born after 1980, thrive on lots of red-hot feedback.Such formality can be as crippling as it is cautious. Twelve months is just too long a stretch, especially when someones on the ropes. To paraphrase a Web joke making the rounds these days: Last year, you reached rock bottom. Well, this year, youve started to dig.In a recent survey, 65 percent of Generation Y workers at Ernst & Young said providing detailed guidance in daily work was moderately or extremely important, compared with 39 percent of Baby Boomers, reports the Journal. An overwhelming 85 percent of Gen Y employees said their age-group peers want frequent and candid performance feedback, while only half of Boomers agreed. Even when the input is not positive, younger employees would rather get bad news fast than no news at all. In an instant information world, its often possible to give feedback a lot faster. Surprises in annual reviews are increasingly likely to result in bad morale. A Business Week article cites the wisdom that a good manager is one who, in an annual review of an employee, doesnt say anything for the first time. In other words, the boss should have conveyed the most important feedback in real time, throughout the year. Some Gen-Yers navely assume bosses will dish out praise. An expert in the Journal says they grew up in a world where everyone gets a trophy. Trophy awards can easily get out of hand, as with the outbreak in title inflation. A recent New York Times article commented: If an employer limits how many people can hold a given title, and if people with that title dont move up or retire, more-junior employees may become frustrated and leave for other jobs. While titles may seem cheaper than raises during a slowdown, hyped titles can bankrupt a companys structure long-term. Dont tell subordinates they are or they arent something in absolutes. A Conference Board article recommends behavioral-frequency evaluation. Point to specific cases when employees were a true master in certain skills. Some judgments need time. A meaningful appraisal includes measuring an employees staying power over time. Persistence, response to setbacks, and other key traits cant be rated in a day. The One Minute Manager, by Ken Blanchard and Spencer Johnson, is the all-time classic on giving feedback. They term feedback breakfast of champions. The reason weaker managers avoid regular feedback is so they can play gotcha! when an employee stumbles. It makes insecure bosses look better.Businesses with antique review practices often suffer from planning paralysis. New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg once wrote about his company, Bloomberg L.P.: While our competitors are still sucking their thumbs trying to make the design perfect, were already on prototype version #5 … It gets back to planning versus acting: We act from day one; others plan how to plan for months.Mackays Moral: Too rigid a feedback loop can prove a noose around your neck. Harvey Mackay is a part-time Aspen resident and best-selling author of Swim with the Sharks. He can be reached on the Web at http://www.harveymackay.com. His column is a feature of Inside Business, published Tuesdays in The Aspen Times.
Support Local Journalism
Support Local Journalism
Readers around Aspen and Snowmass Village make the Aspen Times’ work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.
Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.
Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.
Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.
User Legend: Moderator Trusted User
Three longtime residents of the lower Roaring Fork Valley talk about the sinking feeling that built Monday and Tuesday as the Grizzly Creek Fire grew. They are hoping the threat to their neighborhoods has passed.