Glenwood council postpones RFTA access plan comments
Glenwood Springs City Council will hold off on making any comments on the Rio Grande Trail corridor Access Control Plan until after meeting next month with other area elected officials to discuss the ramifications of the proposal.
Garfield County commissioners have suggested a roundtable meeting among the local government members of the Roaring Fork Transportation Authority, which oversees the former railroad corridor, and others who would be impacted by the restrictive access plan.
That meeting is tentatively scheduled for the evening of March 4 in Glenwood Springs.
The City Council had been set to take up formal comments at its Thursday meeting to send to RFTA by a deadline set for today, stating its concerns about the access plan.
However, several RFTA member governments have asked for at least a 30-day extension to that comment period, and the Garfield commissioners have asked for another 60 days to prepare their comments.
City and county as well as Carbondale town officials have aired concerns about the plan since it was released for comment at the end of the year.
Glenwood Springs and county officials in particular think the access plan as proposed goes too far in its attempt to control access across the corridor as it relates to both public and private land-use and development.
“I do think there is a lot to be gained from having a conversation with the county and with Carbondale so that we can listen to each other’s concerns and develop comments,” City Councilman Stephen Bershenyi said.
Private-property owners along the corridor also should be brought into the discussion, Councilman Mike Gamba said.
“I believe a significant number of them don’t understand the ramification of this proposed policy,” he said.
Councilman Dave Sturges advised that he has been encouraging RFTA for many years to shore up its access control plan.
The plan is intended to protect not only the foot and bike trail that exists on the corridor today but the “railbanked” legal status of the corridor that preserves it for a future commuter train or reinstatement of freight rail, should either of those options become feasible.
“I have pushed RFTA to get in and do this before we had all these site-specific issues,” Sturges said, referring specifically to the city’s proposed South Bridge project, which involves a trail crossing; and the planned Eighth Street connection, which crosses the “wye” section of the rail line.
Sturges said the process now needs to be slowed down so the public can have adequate time to examine and comment on the access plan.
City Engineer Terri Partch said she was informed that the Colorado Department of Transportation also is likely to comment on RFTA’s access plan. CDOT was prompted to take its time two years ago when it was developing its own access control plan for Highway 82.
Earlier this week, RFTA assured county commissioners that the plan is not intended to deny the legal right of property owners to continue to use historical crossings of the railroad corridor. They also assured a handful of Glenwood Springs property owners whose land appears to encroach on a section of the right of way, based on a 2012 survey, that the agency would work to rectify that situation.
Support Local Journalism
Support Local Journalism
Readers around Aspen and Snowmass Village make the Aspen Times’ work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.
Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.
Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.
Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.
User Legend: Moderator Trusted User
The Glenwood Springs city council voted to approve planning a public engagement process for South Canyon improvement possibilities, along with a request for proposals from developers.