Fractional owner prevails over Dancing Bear
A judge has ruled that a fractional owner at the Dancing Bear Aspen Residence Club can collect all rental proceeds from leasing out his unit.
Pitkin County District Judge Chris Seldin delivered the order last month, nearly one year after Thomas H. Wilson sued the Dancing Bear Residences Owners Association in U.S. District Court in Denver. The case was later refiled in Pitkin County.
Wilson bought his one-eighth unit in 2009, the complaint said. He initially received income from the rentals in 2009 and 2010, when the Dancing Bear was under previous ownership.
The one-eighth fractional ownership entitled Wilson to use the unit six weeks a year. His suit claimed he lost as much as $100,000 in rental income after Aspen development firm Sunrise Co. bought the Dancing Bear, located at 411 S. Monarch St., from DB Capital Holdings, which had gone bankrupt.
Income from Wilson’s rental went to the Dancing Bear Residences Owners Association, which claimed that the association, not the unit owner, was entitled to the lease proceeds. Seldin delivered his order in a summary judgment. The judge determined that language in the Dancing Bear’s covenants favored Wilson’s claim.
Sunrise officials were not available for comment last week. At the time Wilson filed the suit, Randall Bone, president of Sunrise, said the rules were clear.
“The issue is not about the rentals; it’s about the money,” Bone told The Aspen Times. “He would like to rent the unit out and keep the money, but the policy is the owners’ association rents it out and all of the money goes back to the owners’ association.”
Wilson, a full-time resident of California, could not be reached for comment.
Support Local Journalism
Support Local Journalism
Readers around Aspen and Snowmass Village make the Aspen Times’ work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.
Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.
Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.
Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.
User Legend: Moderator Trusted User
Garfield County’s health care network easily has the capacity to administer twice as many COVID-19 vaccinations than it has given so far. The problem, officials said Monday, is that the county has only received about half the doses requested from the state.