Feds set rules for oil-shale drilling
The Associated Press
Aspen, CO Colorado
WASHINGTON ” The Bush administration gave energy companies steep discounts in the royalties they will be required to pay as it established the groundwork Monday for commercial oil shale development on federal land.
Interior Department officials said the 5 percent royalty rate during the first five years of production was needed to spur drilling while still giving taxpayers a fair return. But that rate is much lower than the 12.5 percent to 18.8 percent the government collects from companies harvesting conventional oil and gas on public lands.
“In the short run, the American economy will continue to rely on oil and that means we need to increase supplies particularly here at home,” said Stephen Allred, Assistant Secretary of Land and Minerals Management, during a call with reporters. “Public lands have a significant role to play.”
Monday’s announcement sets parameters such as the royalty rate and lease sizes, but it will be up to the incoming Obama administration to decide whether to proceed with leasing. Officials on Monday said commercial leasing was five to 10 years away.
The announcement by the Interior Department comes months after Congress ” pressured by the White House and Republicans to increase domestic energy ” failed to renew a ban on issuing final oil shale regulations.
In September, the Bush administration opened up approximately 1.9 million acres of federal property in Wyoming, Colorado and Utah to potential oil shale development.
Lawmakers from those Western states, which will receive half of the royalties collected, have said it is too early to issue final rules on oil shale development since so little is known about its impacts on the environment and water resources.
“These regulations are premature and flawed,” said Sen. Ken Salazar, D-Colo., in a statement. “The Bush administration is rushing ahead with rules for a development process that they know little about,”
But Allred said ‘rules of the road’ were needed now so companies could plan investments. Leasing would not occur, he said, without further environmental review.
Up to 800 billion barrels of oil ” enough to displace oil imports for 100 years, according to the Interior Department ” is locked within fine-grained rock known as oil shale. The bulk of the resources are within a 16,000-square-mile area known as the Green River formation in Colorado, Utah and Wyoming.
Energy companies are looking into various ways of extracting the oil economically. Unlike traditional sources of oil, oil shale is costly to produce. Energy is needed to bake the rock and pump the molten oil to the surface. Shale oil can cost about $37.75 to $65.21 a barrel to produce, compared with $19.50 per barrel for conventional crude, according to Interior Department figures.
A government program to subsidize oil shale development in the 1980s was shut down when cost figures came in at several times the then-market price for oil.
DENVER ” Colorado’s governor and one of its senators pounced on the Bush administration Monday for what they called “reckless” and “flawed” new rules for commercial oil shale development.
“I’m very disappointed that in the waning months of the Bush administration they felt the need to write the rules on commercial leasing,” Gov. Bill Ritter said in a conference call from Tokyo, where he’s on an economic development trip.
“It’s not just premature, it’s hasty and I would even argue reckless,” said Ritter, a Democrat.
Sen. Ken Salazar, also a Democrat, said the Bush administration is “allowing political timelines to trump sound policy.”
He said the administration doesn’t know yet where the water and energy will come from to extract oil from shale ” or if the process is even viable on a commercial scale.
“Rather than completing the necessary research and development, the Bush administration is rushing ahead with rules for a development process they know little about,” Salazar said.
The Interior Department released the rules Monday. Among the provisions: requiring companies to pay a 5 percent royalty rate during the first five years of production, compared with 12.5 percent to 18.8 percent for conventional oil and gas production on public lands.
Salazar and Sen.-elect Mark Udall both questioned the royalty rate. Salazar called it a “pittance” that would short Colorado by billions of dollars.
Salazar also questioned the impact commercial development would have on Colorado water.
He said the new rules acknowledge that energy companies might have to acquire agricultural water rights to make the process work, a move certain to provoke heated and emotional opposition in a state where water is the rarest natural resource.
Udall said the administration is “ignoring the preferences of Colorado communities, particularly those on the Western Slope.”
Udall, a Democratic congressman, won the Nov. 4 election to replace Republican Wayne Allard, who is retiring.
Salazar’s brother, Democratic Rep. John Salazar, was also critical, saying water, energy and the impact of shale development on Colorado towns remain unresolved.
Harris Sherman, director of the Colorado Department of Natural Resources, said it was “irresponsible” to move ahead before officials have a better idea of which technologies will work and what the likely impact will be on towns, air, water and land.
Support Local Journalism
Support Local Journalism
Readers around Aspen and Snowmass Village make the Aspen Times’ work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.
Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.
Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.
Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.
User Legend: Moderator Trusted User
A management plan for the Marolt Open Space guides the city to largely leave it alone, although a feasibility study will be done for a potential bike park on the south side of the property.