Facts don’t back statements
Columnist Sheldon Fingerman recently expressed the fear that our affordable program will result in a large body of retired workers hanging around Aspen.
“Every employee housing project in the valley will eventually become retirement housing,” he states, reiterating one of Pepper Gomes’ rationales for opposing the housing program.
Actually, the contrary proposition is much in evidence: There may come a time when affordable housing is the only part of the community not dedicated to retirement living.
The statistics on our aging population are clear and unbiased. The census data shows that the blocks that are exclusively affordable housing are aging at a much slower rate than the rest of the community.
For example, Mr. Gomes’ unit in Hunter Creek is part of a statistical neighborhood with a median age in the 30s. Other census blocks that are comprised entirely of affordable housing units have similarly resisted the trend: for example the Snowmass Mountain View block has a median age in the low 30s.
The voter rolls tell the same story: the declining number of younger voters (under 40) are increasingly concentrated in affordable housing neighborhoods.
The fact is that affordable housing units do turn over and the incoming buyers tend to be young, much younger than the buyers of free-market residential property. Free-market neighborhoods in Aspen are losing population in all of the 20 to 45 age groups.
These statistics are consistent with the observation that second- (or third-) home buyers are typically (but not uniformly) older. It takes most buyers many years to accumulate the funds and time off that make a free-market home in Aspen a possibility.
Thus, some of the census blocks with no affordable housing show populations with median ages of 50 or more. I will send the appropriate data bases to any interested reader on request to email@example.com.
Beyond the number crunching, I don’t understand what is wrong with someone deciding, after decades of hard work in our multi-job lifestyle, to remain in Aspen as a retiree. Are not older people, even older workers, an asset to the community they helped create?
I believe extended families and a mix of age groups is a good thing, not a problem to be solved by shipping our workers downvalley before they get it in their heads to stay here permanently.
Support Local Journalism
Support Local Journalism
Readers around Aspen and Snowmass Village make the Aspen Times’ work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.
Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.
Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.
Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.
User Legend: Moderator Trusted User
Three longtime residents of the lower Roaring Fork Valley talk about the sinking feeling that built Monday and Tuesday as the Grizzly Creek Fire grew. They are hoping the threat to their neighborhoods has passed.