Equitable housing | AspenTimes.com

Equitable housing

Dear Editor:It was great to hear Roger Marolt’s perspective in his Friday morning column. The most absurd “haves/have-nots” divide in Aspen, in my view, is not between the “rich” and the “not rich,” but between those who were able to buy employee housing, and those who were not. Of course, never again to be “voices at the table” in the Aspen housing debate are the voices of those who have moved downvalley as a result of not being able to wait four years (or maybe much longer) simply to play a lottery. Don’t get me wrong – I prefer it in Carbondale – but for most everyone else in my situation who aspires to own a home, preferences do not factor into the equation. In my four years in NYC, I saw and documented the inequities bred by the city’s rent-control system. Rent control (and Aspen employee housing) is great and democratic in theory, but only if access to it is equitable once minimum stipulations are met. The debate up there needs to remain over increasing the supply of employee housing, not improving the lots of those who already have it. Jeremy SimonCarbondale

Support Local Journalism

Support Local Journalism

Readers around Aspen and Snowmass Village make the Aspen Times’ work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.

Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.

Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.

For tax deductible donations, click here.

Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.

User Legend: iconModerator iconTrusted User