Damage control in volatile economy
Aspen’s long-term success depends on the creation of an economy that is not overly dependent on the wild swings of fortune alternatively enjoyed and then suffered by the narrow slice of what Wall Street Journal author Robert Frank describes in his 2011 book “The High Beta Rich.”
Aspen can ill afford to see its downtown economic engine converted into a speculative venue for the excesses of an increasingly volatile finance-driven economy. The downturn following the speculative dot-com bust sapped the vitality of Aspen’s core as residential development supplanted commercial vitality, leaving behind vacant spaces.
In addition, allowing the transformation of commercial space into residential speculative cold beds forced up rents for remaining commercial space.
The violent swings of a speculative-based economy has had other adverse consequences. Public policy response to the boom-bust-dot.com cycle led to the “infill” zoning that greatly increased allowed downtown mass and scale in hopes of restoring economic activity. The result was that the subsequent era of toxic mortgages and jackpot pay-outs to money managers saw even more viable businesses and profitable lodges replaced with more “cold bed” residential space.
The Little Red Ski Haus, the Crystal Palace, the Mother Lode and the Chart House were all swallowed up in the speculative frenzy aimed at creating luxury residences. Each of these businesses contributed to a sustainable economy, providing beds or meals, and each was a popular venue for our guests. Each now remains in financial limbo, waiting the salvation of another boom or a court-ordered sale.
It is, as a legal matter, too late to rezone Little Annie’s or the Benton Building. Nonetheless, I do not favor negotiating the preservation of those buildings. Either the buildings are historic and should be ruled as such by the City Council, or they are not eligible for such classification.
If the buildings are properly found to be historic, there is no need to pay “ransom” or whatever one chooses to call the $4.5 million in concessions that have been asked. If the buildings do not merit protection as part of the historic district, then there is no justification for paying someone not to tear them down.
Frank warns us: “Yet Aspen’s next crisis – and there will be a next crisis – will likely be more extreme than the last. … Hypercycles of euphoria and despair, and the strains they produce on the daily bonds of community, are now as much a feature of Aspen’s landscape as the snowcapped peak of Mount Sopris.”
We cannot reform the national economy, but we can dampen some of the excess with zoning that restores a more moderate mass and scale and places larger structures where they fit. Sunnier streets and small-town feel are not recession-proof but offer our best opportunity to sustain Aspen as a premier resort. Let’s amend the land-use code to conform with the desires of the citizens and endanger fewer puppies.
Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.
The city of Aspen’s office building is exempt from paying encroachment fees, yet private developers have to now pay $9 a square foot, per month, starting in 2020.