Colorado tax-and-spending limits come under fire
The Associated Press
Aspen, CO Colorado
DENVER – A group of Democratic and Republican officials said Monday they filed a legal challenge against a 1992 initiative that imposed strict limits on taxing and spending, calling the measure an unconstitutional “straitjacket” that renders the legislative branch ineffective.
The lawsuit in federal court aims to undo the state’s Taxpayers Bill of Rights, commonly known in Colorado as TABOR. The lawsuit contends the initiative is unconstitutional “because it deprives the state and its citizens of effective representative democracy.”
More than 30 current and former public officials joined the lawsuit.
Jon Caldara, a prominent TABOR supporter and president of the conservative Independence Institute, said the lawsuit has a “one in a bazillion chance” of succeeding.
“It’s not dead on arrival. It’s laughable on arrival,” he said.
Colorado lawmakers have been divided on the merits of the initiative since voters approved it as a state constitutional amendment in 1992. It requires lawmakers to ask voters to raise taxes and limits the amount of tax revenue the state can keep and spend because government can’t grow faster than the combined rate of inflation and population growth. However, TABOR makes no provision for rising productivity, so if incomes rise, taxes stay flat.
As of last year, 30 states had some type of tax or spending limitations, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures, but analysts say Colorado has the most stringent tax-and-spend requirements.
Colorado is among three states, along with Oregon and Oklahoma, that have a combination of tax and spending limits, but Colorado is the only one that requires voter approval for all tax increases, NCSL said. Missouri and Washington require voter approval for taxes, but only when they’re over a certain amount.
The Florida Legislature agreed earlier this month to put a measure modeled after TABOR on the state’s 2012 November ballot. Last month, Republican Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer vetoed a proposed spending limit similar to Colorado’s formula, saying the measure would be too restrictive.
“We should learn from the state of Colorado that experimented with a similar mechanism, an experience that failed,” Brewer said at the time.
Colorado lawmakers who oppose TABOR say in the lawsuit that the state has “experienced a slow, inexorable slide into fiscal dysfunction” since its passage.
“TABOR is a unique monstrosity,” said Sen. John Morse, the Democratic leader in the state Senate. “It’s taken everybody a long time to figure out what it is and what it does.”
Caldara said he doesn’t buy the argument that lawmakers are currently hamstrung by TABOR’s spending limits because voters approved a referendum in 2005 that allowed state government to keep all revenues it collected for the next five years.
“The reason they can’t do their jobs is because they spend too much,” Caldara said. “If anybody claims that TABOR is tying their hands right now, then they are not qualified to be an elected official because they don’t understand the law.”
Snowmass Villagers have just shy of a month left to provide comments on proposed regulations for short-term rentals in the town.
Support Local Journalism
Support Local Journalism
Readers around Aspen and Snowmass Village make the Aspen Times’ work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.
Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.
Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.
Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.
User Legend: Moderator Trusted User