Colorado Prop DD: Measure to allow sports betting to fund water projects too close to call
The closest race Tuesday night remains too close to call on whether Colorado voters would passed a measure to legalize sports betting and use the taxes raised to fund projects outlined in the Colorado Water Plan.
As of 10:40 p.m., unofficial results showed Proposition DD passing by less than 1,000 votes — with 50.03 percent of Colorado voters in favor of the measure and 49.97 percent against it.
In Pitkin County, 60 percent of voters supported the measure and in Eagle County 58.4 percent of voters were in support of it.
Voters in Garfield County rejected Proposition DD with 52.3 percent of voters against it.
If Proposition DD was to pass, the state would be authorized to collect a 10% tax up to $29 million (but probably closer to $15 million) a year from casino’s sports-betting proceeds. The money would go toward funding projects that align with the goals outlined in the water plan, as well as toward meeting interstate obligations such as the Colorado River Compact.
The plan, outlined in a 567-page policy document, does not prescribe or endorse specific projects, but, instead, sets Colorado’s water values, goals and measurable objectives. According to the water plan, there is an estimated funding gap of $100 million per year over 30 years, but Colorado Water Conservation Board officials have said that number is an estimate and not precise.
Some of the projects outlined in the water plan stand in opposition to one another — for example stream restoration projects with an emphasis on environmental health and building or expanding dams and reservoirs that would divert and impound more Colorado River water. Proposition DD funding could go toward any of these.
The funds would be administered by the Colorado Water Conservation Board, a statewide agency charged with managing Colorado’s water supply.
In addition to doling out money from Proposition DD in the form of water-plan grants, the revenue could also be spent to ensure compliance with interstate compacts and to pay water users for temporary and voluntary reductions in consumptive use. That could mean a demand management program — the feasibility of which the state is currently studying — in which agricultural water users would be paid to leave more water in the river.
The measure had received broad support from environmental organizations, agriculture interests, water-conservation districts and even Aspen Skiing Company.
Editor’s note: Aspen Journalism collaborates with The Aspen Times and other Swift Communications newspapers on coverage of rivers and water. For more, go to aspenjournalism.org.
Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.
Campaign finance reports were due recently for candidates in the April 7 races for mayor and three council seats in Basalt. Only three of nine total candidates collected donations, according to their reports.