Colorado lawmakers nix first-ever pot investment fund
The Associated Press
Aspen, CO Colorado
DENVER – The nation’s first proposed state-backed investment bank for the marijuana business failed Tuesday after a fiery debate in the Colorado House.
Democrats and Republicans fell on both sides of the argument over starting a fund to legitimize investment in marijuana research. The proposed Colorado Investment Trust was promoted as a way to allow pot shops to borrow money and bank.
“This will legitimize this business, bring them into the light of day,” said Republican Rep. Tom Massey, the idea’s sponsor.
But opponents sided with another Republican who argued that because marijuana is federally illegal, and FDIC-insured banks won’t accept marijuana money, Colorado would be wading into perilous legal territory if it tried to oversee marijuana-funded business.
“There’s no way to get around this. … You can’t violate the federal law,” argued Republican Rep. Mark Barker, who argued against the trust fund. The fund would have been the nation’s first in which a state allowing medical marijuana also oversees business transactions rejected by federally chartered banks and investment firms.
Some Democrats opposed the idea, too. Rep. Claire Levy of Boulder agreed that the fund could put Colorado in conflict with federal banking regulations.
“I understand the problem of dealing with cash,” Levy said, “but it puts the state in the business of investing in marijuana centers.”
House members rejected the fund on a voice vote but then went on to give preliminary approval to a raft of new regulations for Colorado’s booming marijuana business.
The new regulations relax residency requirements for people working in pot dispensaries, so that owners but not employees have to have been in Colorado for two years.
The bill extends by one year, to summer 2012, a moratorium on new dispensaries. It also sets up privacy requirements for how dispensaries handle patient records, and requires caregivers growing pot in their homes to register their operations with local authorities.
In addition, the bill sets a new 500-plant limit for makers of infused marijuana products, such as pot brownies. Dispensaries would be able to sell no more than six nonflowering plants to a patient within a three-month period.
The measure faces a more formal vote in the House before heading to the Senate.
Massey, who described the bill as a “cleanup” to sweeping pot rules adopted last year, said the tweaks don’t make pot supporters happy. But he argued law enforcement doesn’t like the rules, either. Massey told the House that marijuana rules are something lawmakers and police can’t ignore.
“It’s somewhat like a Chicken Little situation for law enforcement – they just want it to go away. And it’s not going to go away. It’s a legitimate business in Colorado,” Massey said.
House members agreed to send $1 million in marijuana sales taxes to the Circle Program, a drug-treatment program at the Colorado Mental Health Institute at Pueblo. Pot sales taxes are already being used for substance abuse treatment, but the Circle Program designation directs more money to that specific program.
Support Local Journalism
Support Local Journalism
Readers around Aspen and Snowmass Village make the Aspen Times’ work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.
Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.
Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.
Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.
User Legend: Moderator Trusted User
Citing the fire threat, the U.S. Forest Service on Wednesday closed about 1,555 square miles of forest land in five counties near Colorado’s heavily populated Front Range — an area bigger than the state of Rhode Island.