CARE is not no-kill
Dear Editor:I find it quite annoying and misleading that Colorado Animal REscue continues to tout itself as a “no-kill facility.” As much as the staff of CARE would like you to believe this to be fact, especially when soliciting funds, it simply is not the case. Note the Glenwood Springs Post Independent’s Oct. 27 article in which CARE board member Nancy Genova states, “I promised her we would do everything possible not to euthanize the dog.” Further, note Leslie Rockey’s e-mail to Sue Schmidt in which she states, “We will choose euthanasia when an animal has negative behaviors… .” It is a shame and an injustice that there is even a discussion taking place about euthanizing pets that survived Hurricane Katrina. The dogs obviously would have been better off not being “rescued” by CARE. I, along with Bland Nesbit, Melinda Goldrich and Jan Panico, traveled to Louisiana in the week following Hurricane Katrina and worked in the Humane Society’s shelter, caring for these animals for a week. We brought back 18 dogs, some of which were extremely traumatized by what they had been through. I am happy to say that all of these dogs are now well-adjusted, and all but one are in loving foster homes with foster “parents” that want to adopt them. Leslie Rockey’s unwillingness to relinquish Buster and others to a true no-kill animal care facility is pure stubbornness on her part, as was her decision not to let some of the animals that tested positive for heartworms begin immediate treatment – offered at no cost to CARE, I might add. By Leslie’s own admission, Buster biting her was due in large part to mistakes she made while handling the dog. As a “certified veterinary technician,” she should have known better and exercised caution in handling a drugged dog that did not know her.These animals deserve to live. Leslie, accept responsibility for the mistakes you made and relinquish these Katrina pets to a true no-kill facility.Anne GurchickAspen
Support Local Journalism
Support Local Journalism
Readers around Aspen and Snowmass Village make the Aspen Times’ work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.
Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.
Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.
Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.
User Legend: Moderator Trusted User
Aspen councilman gets tongue lashing from colleagues for email suggesting answers for housing survey
A survey asking for public outreach on the city of Aspen’s Lumberyard affordable housing project is the subject of controversy among the city’s elected officials.