Bickering continues over Colorado district lines
The Associated Press
Aspen, CO Colorado
DENVER – With the clock ticking, Colorado’s Republicans and Democrats on Monday again failed to strike a deal on new congressional district lines.
The Republican House and Democratic Senate debated rival congressional redistricting plans. With just two working days left before their deadline, there was no sign the parties have agreed on how to redraw lines as required after every census.
Both parties talked up their plans as best. The GOP wants only minor adjustments to a map that gives them a 4-3 U.S. House advantage over Democrats. Democrats, meanwhile, argue for more competitive districts in which either party has a chance.
“We are trying not to do violence to the existing map,” said Republican Rep. David Balmer, leading a House debate over the GOP plan.
A few hours later, the Democratic Senate muddled past midnight with no agreement, possibly closing the door on any agreement this term. There was more finger-pointing than cohesive argument as the clock ticked past midnight.
“This is embarrassing for the people you represent,” Republican Sen. Ted Harvey told his Democratic colleagues.
Democratic Sen. Gail Schwartz insisted that voters who attended public hearings want new lines to give either side a shot and produce more-moderate lawmakers.
“They wanted to be in a competitive district where their votes actually matter,” Schwartz said.
Even as both sides debated their maps, legislative leaders spent much of the day huddled behind closed doors trying to craft a compromise. If lawmakers can’t agree by Wednesday, they face a special session or a lawsuit because the districts must be adjusted to account for population changes.
Political competitiveness isn’t a new debate in Colorado, where lawmakers haven’t been able to agree on new lines for at least 30 years.
Last decade, when Colorado gained one new member of Congress because of population growth, a Denver district court judge picked a map that gave Republicans, Democrats and unaffiliated voters nearly equal representation in the new district.
This time around, both parties argue they have legal precedent to push their plans through in court.
That scenario appears inevitable. A bipartisan panel set up to broker a map both sides could agree on was abandoned weeks ago, and even lawmakers who last week argued compromise is still possible seemed ready to throw in the towel Monday.
“It was infinitely more difficult than any of us could have imagined” to agree on a map, concluded the Democrats’ lead Senate negotiator, Sen. Rollie Heath of Boulder.
On that count, Republicans agreed that the bipartisan effort was naive.
“It looks like the committee is going to fail in its work and this is going to end up in court,” Republican Sen. Mark Scheffel said.
Support Local Journalism
Support Local Journalism
Readers around Aspen and Snowmass Village make the Aspen Times’ work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.
Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.
Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.
Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.
User Legend: Moderator Trusted User
With a current backlog of 147 jury trials in the three-county judicial district, and only one felony and one misdemeanor trial allowed at a time, the need for more staffing is imperative said Ninth District Attorney Jeff Cheney.