Aspen’s ironic traffic history
Dear Editor:Efforts to improve traffic flow into Aspen were first undertaken in 1968, long before 1994 as reported by Ms. Nicoletti in her Jan. 24 article.Funds were budgeted in 1968 and by 1970 a completed design was ready for construction from Aspen to Brush Creek. At that time the most expensive land needed for right of way cost $12,000 per acre. The design called for a straight connection to Main Street, eliminating the inefficient S-curves.During February 1970, opponents to the improvement, led by Dwight Shellman and Bob Lewis, took over the design public hearing at the courthouse, resulting in a five-hour-long, often raucous, meeting. Details remain clearly in my 81-year-old mind. I was the district engineer leading the CDOT charge. Because of the controversy, chief engineer Charlie Shumate canceled the project.During the late 1970s we prepared an EIS covering the area from Aspen to Carbondale. At a design public hearing held in Basalt during early 1982, I announced that the EIS was recommending the “do-nothing” alternative from Wingo Junction to Aspen. Opposition to improvements near Aspen was holding up modernization of all of the lower portion of SH 82. The EIS was approved with that recommendation, and reconstruction resumed from Carbondale south.All of these years from about 1975, Aspen could have been enjoying a smoothly flowing parkway that we proposed. Opponents claimed that a four-lane highway would cause Aspen to grow. That happened anyway. I would love to hear a public admission of mistakes made by leaders of the opposition.Dick ProsencePhoenix
Support Local Journalism
Support Local Journalism
Readers around Aspen and Snowmass Village make the Aspen Times’ work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.
Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.
Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.
Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.
User Legend: Moderator Trusted User
It might be public service serving on Aspen City Council but it doesn’t pay enough, the majority of electeds say. That’s why they are proposing to give their successors a $12,000 raise.