Anti-meat letter unoriginal, inaccurate | AspenTimes.com
YOUR AD HERE »

Anti-meat letter unoriginal, inaccurate

Dear Editors:

An anti-meat letter that ran in The Aspen Times is a classic example of “astroturf” (Washington, D.C., slang for fake grassroots movements) (“Meat eaters take note,” Dec. 29). The identical letter has run at least a dozen times across the United States and in Canada with a different signer in each paper.

And astroturfed doesn’t mean accurate. A wide-ranging review of studies examining meat’s alleged link to colorectal cancer that appeared in the May issue of Obesity Reviews found no evidence to support an association, much less a causal link, between eating red meat and that form of cancer.

Being a strict vegetarian – or even a vegan – is fine for the 1 to 2 percent of people who choose that diet, but the fact that they have to disseminate astroturf letters shows how little support they have for their agenda.

J. Justin Wilson

Senior research analyst,

Center for Consumer Freedom

Washington, D.C.


Support Local Journalism

Support Local Journalism

Readers around Aspen and Snowmass Village make the Aspen Times’ work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.

Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.

Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.

For tax deductible donations, click here.
 


Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.

User Legend: iconModerator iconTrusted User