Abortion issue OK’d for Colorado ballot
The Associated Press
Aspen, CO Colorado
DENVER ” Colorado moved a step closer to an election battle over abortion rights on Thursday when a proposal defining a fertilized human egg as a person was certified for the November ballot.
Secretary of State Mike Coffman said backers of the proposed state constitutional amendment turned in an estimated 103,000 valid signatures, far more than the 76,000 required.
Coffman’s ruling sets up a potentially heated campaign over the measure, now designated Amendment 48.
Kristi Burton, the prime mover behind the measure, said her group, Colorado for Equal Rights, will target Colorado voters who personally oppose abortion but don’t want to impose their views on others.
Burton said polling shows those voters make up about 20 percent of the electorate.
“Our job is to put the truth out there for the voters,” she said. “Science is on our side.”
“Defining an egg as a person in our constitution and statutes isn’t science-based and makes bad public policy,” said Crystal Clinkenbeard, a spokeswoman for an organization called Protect Families Protect Choices, which opposes the measure.
“We know (Burton’s group) hopes make Colorado ground zero in their fight,” Clinkenbeard said.
Opponents say Amendment 48 could affect birth control because the most widely used form of contraception works by preventing fertilized eggs from attaching to the uterus.
They also say the measure could deter in-vitro fertilization and stem cell research and bar doctors from treating women with some forms of cancer.
Clinkenbeard said Protect Families Protect Choices has no plans to challenge the signatures but will campaign against the measure.
“We’ve decided to challenge it in the court of public opinion,” she said. “When Colorado voters have faced measures that would restrict health care access and place the government in the midst of private decisions, they have rejected these measures in the past.”
Colorado for Equal Rights turned in a total of 130,000 signatures. Coffman’s office determined that about 103,000 were valid, based on an examination of a computer-selected random sample of roughly 6,500 signatures or 5 percent of the total.
Coffman’s spokesman, Rich Coolidge, says state law established the sampling method for verifying signatures.
Support Local Journalism
Support Local Journalism
Readers around Aspen and Snowmass Village make the Aspen Times’ work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.
Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.
Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.
Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.
User Legend: Moderator Trusted User
Each week, we pick out our favorite and not-so-favorite tweets (at least those that are printable) about Aspen and display them on Sunday’s page A2.