A well-informed council member
Dear Editor:The inner workings of local government are beyond my knowledge, but rational thinking would suggest it’s absurd a City Council member who has served on the Planning and Zoning Commission, and therefore has a depth of knowledge of projects brought before the P&Z, should have to recuse himself from discussion and voting on the same project that comes before the City Council. I don’t believe previous examination and knowledge of a project constitutes a conflict of interest. Common sense and reason would support the premise that this council member has the MOST knowledge of the project and therefore brings valuable insight to the City Council decision-making process.As the City Council considers improvements in city procedures, I suggest this council rule should be changed so a previous P&Z commissioner does not have to recuse himself from discussing the same project on City Council. His background knowledge and insight are paramount to the council’s making a well-informed decision.Susan O’NealAspen
Support Local Journalism
Readers around Aspen and Snowmass Village make the Aspen Times’ work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.
Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.
Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.
Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.
User Legend: Moderator Trusted User