A true "emergency"?
Dear Editor:Objections to Ordinance 30 are clear and valid. They are: Council has invoked an “emergency” where there is none. Council has circumvented the legislative process, including public hearings, by declaring an emergency. What does this say about a council which has been in place for a few weeks? Are they afraid to follow the rules? Council places the responsibility for determining if a property is historical on the citizens. Since citizens have not asked for this responsibility (or this ordinance) – what is fair about that? Further, it goes against current policy for historical designation, which places the responsibility on the city to prove historical significance. Council has declared anything over 30 years old to be historical. My goodness, I think 30 is young!Please join me in asking the Aspen City Council to reconsider Ordinance 30.Penney Evans CarruthAspen
Support Local Journalism
Readers around Aspen and Snowmass Village make the Aspen Times’ work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.
Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.
Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.
Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.
User Legend: Moderator Trusted User