A slanted Squirm Night | AspenTimes.com

A slanted Squirm Night

Under Bil Dunaway, The Times had a reputation for fairness, but the forum Tuesday night did not live up to that standard.

The political debate, Squirm Night, as represented by The Times, was heavily slanted.

There were three sets of panels, and each got to speak five minutes. There were two sets for the straight shot and one set for the S-curves. Thus, the straight shot group got twice the time of the S-curves group.

Despite your claims that Jeffrey Evans is not a neutral observor, he is clearly for the straight shot and has been advocating for the four-lane highway over that route. He’s not even an Aspen resident, but was speaking for a position to be decided by Aspen voters.

The moderator, John Sarpa, is not an unbiased party. He was the front man for the hated Ritz Carlton group and a major growth proponent.

The seven-member panel was given about an hour to either make statements or ask questions. Once it became evident that the audience favored the S-curves, Sarpa did his best to stifle any real debate from the audience, especially with longtime local David Amory.

A free and unbiased press is vital; the Times wasn’t an example that night.

Bill Greenwood


Support Local Journalism

Support Local Journalism

Readers around Aspen and Snowmass Village make the Aspen Times’ work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.

Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.

Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.


Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.

User Legend: iconModerator iconTrusted User