A massive blunder?
In a desire to give away more newspapers in a tough economy, The Aspen Times took the low road with their headline about the Lift One Master Plan, “Massive Lift One unveiled to the public” (Nov. 11).
I understand the power of a good headline or title, I have named a few films in my day ” but I was selling tickets not giving away newspapers. They could have chosen another adjective, such as fabulous or thoughtful, but they didn’t. They went negative.
Now, I am a big fan of Carolyn Sackariason, and not sure if she was the perpetrator of this cheap shot headline or just wrote the story. But the story itself seemed to be a bit off tilt. Maybe C-Sack’s finger still hurt her, or maybe all the hours she has spent in agony watching City Council meetings finally took their toll. Not sure ” but I am sure her story didn’t tell the whole story ” not by a long shot.
A few words to set things straight ” Toni Kronberg did not say lawsuits or a referendum were likely. She said she hopes to prevent any from being filed. Can more be said to illustrate my point, than to find myself defending Toni Kronberg? I think not.
Hired gun, attorney Bob Hoover, made page 1 with this statement, “There is no question this is the largest project that has come before you.” He threw in the word “massive” a few times, and then made up the word “largeness” in his closing remark. Again, lawyer not English teacher.
Duh! Of course it’s big. It incorporates two hotels, a ski run, two new lifts, a museum, a revitalized steak house, ski lockers, affordable housing, and partridge in a pear tree (only a rumor).
My point is this. We as a COWOP were charged with looking at the Lift One area in its entirety ” not as individual parts. If we had, there would be five to seven small, medium and/or large projects ” not one “coordinated” effort to produce the best project for the area and Aspen in general.
I understand Bob Hoover ” he is being paid to say those things. But, the Times had a choice. They could tell the entire story, by reporting that there was over 90 percent buy-in by the group, or take a cheap shot with a headline that does nothing but put a negative spin on the project, and insult all who volunteered their time (over 2,000 hours) to work on the Lift One Master Plan.
I find it sad the Times could not find a nice word to say, when a group such as the Lift One COWOP, a melting pot of Aspen locals, gets together over 27 weeks and produces a project as fine as this by reaching consensus through compromise.
I find is sad that The Aspen Times took the low road.
Support Local Journalism
Support Local Journalism
Readers around Aspen and Snowmass Village make the Aspen Times’ work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.
Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.
Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.
Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.
User Legend: Moderator Trusted User