Colorado gubernatorial candidates Polis, Stapleton differ dramatically on climate, energy issues
Energy and environmental issues have surged to the forefront of the battle between longtime Democratic U.S. Rep. Jared Polis and Republican State Treasurer Walker Stapleton to become the next governor of Colorado on Nov. 6.
Both men were asked detailed questions about climate change and state energy production at the final gubernatorial debate Oct. 23 in Denver, and their answers provided very clear contrasts between the two major-party candidates hoping to replace term-limited Democratic Gov. John Hickenlooper.
“Climate change isn’t just an abstract issue,” Polis said Tuesday in Denver. “It’s already affecting important Colorado industries like agriculture, like the ski industry. It affects our water, which is our life source and a source of our economy in Colorado. So we need to act and we need to act now.”
Polis once again touted his “bottom-up, market-oriented plan” for Colorado to move to 100 percent renewable energy by the year 2040. Just less than 20 percent of the state’s current electrical mix is renewable, with 47 percent generated by coal and 34 percent from natural gas.
Stapleton called Polis’ plan an extreme mandate that will drive up utility bills
“We don’t want government mandating what power we need to use,” Stapleton said. “And I’ve spoken with energy experts who tell me that if Congressman Polis’ mandate were put into place, it would result in hardworking Coloradans paying more for their electric bills, more to heat their homes. And that’s a radical, extreme proposal.”
But Polis counters that wind energy is already coming in cheaper than coal-fired power, so he’s proposing — not mandating — a package of incentives and state programs to continue to build on the successes of the past two Democratic administrations. He also said his plan will be particularly effective if Democrats win control of both chambers of the state Legislature.
Stapleton shot back that Polis’ plans — from energy to health care to education — will balloon the state budget and ultimately result in higher taxes.
The two candidates also differ significantly on the issue of electric vehicles, which Hickenlooper championed in June by signing an executive order requiring the state to develop a rule adopting the California Low Emission Vehicle program, which can include gas-electric hybrids. In August, there was support from conservation groups and local governments for both the LEV and the tougher ZEV standard, which is just plug-in and battery electric vehicles.
“Walker’s position on ZEV is the same as LEV — it would hurt Colorado,” Stapleton spokesman Jerrod Dobkin said. “But ZEV would have even worse effects, and Polis has supported this at the federal level.”
Hickenlooper made his move in part because of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s efforts “to roll back vehicle greenhouse gas and fuel-efficiency standards for model years 2022 and beyond.”
“Clean air is incredibly important to our health, especially for our kids and seniors,” Polis said in a prepared statement on the LEV standard. “I support and will continue Gov. Hickenlooper’s efforts to meet the growing demand for low-emission vehicles while fighting pollution, protecting our air quality and addressing climate change.”
First time endorsement
For the first time ever, the Colorado Auto Dealers Association recently endorsed a gubernatorial candidate, giving the nod to Stapleton. And the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers opposes the ZEV mandate because Colorado is already trending ahead of the national average with 1.5 percent of all new car sales electric. The national average is 1 percent.
On the topic of oil and gas drilling, both Polis and Stapleton oppose Proposition 112, increasing setbacks for drilling operations, and Amendment 74, a private property takings measure supported by the oil and gas industry.
Polis doesn’t oppose 112’s setback distance — increasing the current 500 feet to 2,500 feet away from homes, schools and businesses — but rejects the proposition’s failure to include surface-use agreements allowing property owners and mineral rights owners to negotiate proper setbacks.
Stronger setback measures imposed legislatively on a bipartisan basis should be “a backstop for when the landowner and operator can’t reach a surface-use agreement,” Polis told Colorado Oil and Gas Association members in August.
“(Stapleton) has said numerous times he is completely against this ballot initiative (112),” Stapleton spokesman Dobkin said in an email. “Also, it is important to note Polis has bankrolled a ballot measure to increase setbacks to 2,000 feet. A 2,000-foot setback is just as radical as a 2,500-foot setback and could have led to 62,000 job losses and an $11 billion decrease in Colorado’s gross domestic product.”
In 2014, drilling near his Weld County property prompted Polis to back two ballot questions, one of which would have increased setbacks for drilling operations to 2,000 feet away from occupied structures. Polis wound up pulling his support for those ballot questions after striking an eleventh-hour deal with Hickenlooper.
Now a group called Colorado Rising has landed the statutory initiative Proposition 112 on the ballot. The state’s oil and gas industry, working with the Colorado Farm Bureau, has countered with constitutional Amendment 74, “requiring the government to award just compensation to owners of private property when a government law or regulation reduces the fair market value of the property.”
Polis told the Colorado Oil and Gas Association meeting: “(Amendment 74) would have far-reaching ramifications well beyond oil and gas development. Does anybody in this room really believe that local government or state government should not be able to zone for hog farms, cannabis or strip clubs?”
Stapleton also opposes 74, although he is supportive of bolstering private property rights.
“Walker has said he is supportive of the concept but thinks there could be unintended consequences,” Dobkin emailed. “He would support using the legislative process to address concerns different stakeholders have.”
Support Local Journalism
Support Local Journalism
Readers around Aspen and Snowmass Village make the Aspen Times’ work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.
Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.
Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.
Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.
User Legend: Moderator Trusted User
Roaring Fork Valley, Garfield County together in post-census state House map plan; Senate districts shift in latest plan
A post-U.S. Census plan to redraw the state’s legislative district boundaries would create House District 57 that includes all of Garfield and Pitkin counties, along with the small portion of Eagle County that’s in the Roaring Fork Valley.