| AspenTimes.com

Celebrating — and supporting — movement

Bridging Bionics Foundation’s RISE UP GALA Sunday night at the Hotel Jerome was heartwarming, energizing and completely memorable.

I attended the gala solo, not knowing anyone in the room, because my companion couldn’t make it. Normally, this would be daunting, but as soon as I walked into the lounge, a table of attendees from Oregon befriended me; Anna, Marci and Bill Gaynor play in Aspen Meadow Band, which performs at fundraisers for organizations like the Muscular Dystrophy Association, Special Olympics and Relay for Life. I chalk up the overall open heartedness at the gala to why we all came: Because we strongly believe in, and have a soft spot, for BBF’s mission to provide affordable and ongoing physical therapy and advanced technology to individuals with neurological mobility challenges, no matter their ability to pay or not. I risked becoming a wallflower (but was pleasantly met with lively conversation and inclusive groovin’ on the dancefloor) because I cherish movement; as someone who has a master’s degree in dance therapy and somatic psychology, I’ve both witnessed and experienced its healing power.

Sunday’s gala was BBF’s way of visibly demonstrating its impact to the larger community, as well as raising more than half of its annual operating budget.

“It was our most successful event since the inception of our organization six and a half years ago. For that, we are immensely grateful,” said BBF executive director Amanda Boxtel. “With these funds, we will continue giving the gift of mobility to serve our community with our life-changing programming.”

Final numbers aren’t in yet, but three donors committed to paying $50,000 each, another donated $25,000, and several patrons gave amounts ranging from $100 to $10,000. In addition, the live auction earned $70,000 for two separate private dinners with Jimmy Yeager and Tiziano Gortan, and other auction items went for generous amounts.

At Sunday’s RISE UP GALA, 192 guests enjoyed dinner, a live auction and dancing. Charles Engelbert Photography.
Charles Engelbert Photography

“While our physical therapy interventions and growing inventory of advanced technologies are helping our athletes regain mobility and wellness, one challenge remains the same: keeping our program accessible and affordable for all,” Boxtel said. “With increased client demand for our program — we have a waitlist — now more than ever, we needed to rally our supporters and publicly share our mission to continue serving our community with our quality programming. I am truly humbled by the genuine outpouring of love and generosity from the attendees at our 2022 RISE UP GALA.”

Despite a few cancellations from key supporters, including its presenting sponsor who tested positive for COVID the day prior to the gala, BBF’s first signature, in-person event since 2019 was successful on all fronts. Patrons and sponsors — 192 total — enjoyed a cocktail hour sponsored by Dona Vega Mezcal and Woody Creek Distillers; a scrumptious dinner including potato gnocchi, honey and sage brined Guinea hen and dessert; two performances by “Let’s Dance” professional dancer Jasmine Takács and Paralympian Aron Anderson; and incredibly danceable music by Tunisia.

Jasmine Takács and Aron Anderson performed stunning choreography at the gala. Charles Engelbert Photography
Charles Engelbert Photography

As emcee John Sarpa said, “It’s real magic tonight.”

Indeed, it was an evening of celebrating and supporting the body in motion.

“With my new mobility limitations since undergoing four spinal surgeries in 10 weeks, I sat and wept in awe watching Jasmine and Aron move effortlessly,” Boxtel said. “I witnessed the power of their bodies spin gracefully in space, uninhibited and in such unison, as if they were entwined in harmony from the same mould. My heart was full. I became ‘them,’ and, for a moment, I forgot about my own physical limitations. The spirit has no limitations, and that’s what I hold true.”

kim@kimberlynicoletti.com

Aron Anderson and Jasmine Takács perform during dinner at the RISE UP GALA on Sunday. Charles Engelbert Photography.
Charles Engelbert Photography
Bridging Bionics’ clients with their respective helpers, from left to right: Turner Fautsko (child) with mother Jenni Fautsko (Turner is wearing a Trexo robotic walking device); Tyler Williams with physical therapist Debbie Weidemann (Tyler is wearing a Keeogo dermoskeleton); Mackenzie Langley with physical therapist Tami Cassetty (Mackenzie is wearing the Indego exoskeleton); John Spencer with physical therapist Birgit Shinneman (John is wearing the NewGait wearable orthotic device); Yami Torres with physical therapist Kenzi Pizzino (Yami is wearing the Upsee children’s harness); John Goettge with physical therapist Maria Grufstedt and trainer/PT aide Remy Ogden (John is wearing the Ekso GT exoskeleton). Charles Engelbert Photography.
Charles Engelbert Photography
Bridging Bionics by the numbers

Six and half years ago, Amanda Boxtel launched Bridging Bionics Foundation. Since then, it has:

  • Gifted more than 12,000 physical therapy sessions to clients, ages 3-90, with neurological conditions.
  • Served an average of up to 50 clients per week, each with 2-3 weekly mobility sessions.
  • Increased its clinical staff operating out of two facilities in Snowmass Village and Glenwood Springs, five days a week, year-round.
  • Increased its advanced technologies and equipment inventory.
  • Documented that 80% of clients reported improved physical health, and 90% of clients reported improved emotional health.

Kimberly Nicoletti is a freelance writer, editor and the editor of ATW. She can be reached at kim@kimberlynicoletti.com or knicoletti@aspentimes.com.

Judson Haims: Longterm care insurance — the fine print

Long Term Care Insurance (LTCI) is not an insurance most people know much about. Considering that we all will reach a point in life where will need some type of longterm care, it might be worth looking into.

LTCI is an insurance that pays for services that are not covered by private health insurance and sometimes, neither by Medicare. It pays for both medical and non-medical services that aid individuals who are unable to take care of themselves due to prolonged ailment, chronic illness, or disability. The care can be provided in a facility such as an assisted living facility (ALF) or within a person’s home.

Although the insurance may be a good idea to help cover the expensive services involved in keeping a loved one as independent as possible, too often insurers make it difficult to open a claim, refuse to pay them, besiege people in red tape, or delay their having to pay via a “exclusion/elimination period” are undermining the value of this insurance.

In recent years, we have been contacted by many LTCI policy holders who have had policies in affect for 10 to 20 years and are running into trouble when attempting to open claims. Sadly, this has become a big problem for these older policy holders. However, for those considering a new LTCI policy for themselves, this could be a time to become educated.

Last week, I received a call from a friend’s wife who had thought that their LTCI would start reimbursing them as soon as they needed assistance. Unfortunately, she is one of many people who are unaware of some of the fine print of their plan that delay the initiation and/or reimbursement.  

Don’t get me wrong, LTCI is a great product, you just need to be educated of its limitations and restrictions so you can make it work for your needs. Two of the items of LTCI policies people should be particularly aware of are ADLs and “exclusion” or “elimination” periods.”

Most often, to open a claim, a claimant needs to prove to the insurance company that they are deficient in several activities of daily living (ADL) and that they meet the “exclusion/elimination” period requirements. ADLs are those skills required to manage one’s basic physical needs. LTCI policies frequently state that a claimant must be unable to perform two or more ADLs for a claim to be opened. ADLs to be considered in determining eligibility are: bathing, dressing, toileting, transferring and eating.  Most newer policies explain each ADL as follows:

  • Bathing: The ability to sponge bathe or get in and out of bathtub or shower.
  • Eating: The ability to feed oneself by getting food into the body or by a feeding tube.
  • Continence: The ability to maintain control of bladder and bowel functions.
  • Toileting: The ability to get to and from the toilet and perform associated personal hygiene.
  • Dressing: The ability to put on and remove all items of clothing and any braces or artificial limbs.
  • Transferring: The ability to get in and out of bed, chair, or wheelchair.

For the most part, the definition of ADLs has remained the same over time. However, the one ADL that many new policies have modified is, ‘Eating.’  Many older policies had defined ‘Eating’ more broadly as, “The ability to feed oneself.” The concern with the change in definition is that the newer definition is far more limiting.

This change in definition dramatically narrows the ability for many people to show a deficiency. While a person may be able to perform the process of feeding oneself by getting food into the body, they may not be physically or mentally able to prepare a meal. For example, a stroke patient may not physically be able to prepare a meal and a person with cognitive impairment may not recall how to prepare a meal, heat up a meal, or even recall turning of the burners on a range top-thus creating a safety concern.  Further, this newer definition does not take into account the possible challenges of shopping for groceries, recalling what items they need, or even challenges traveling to the grocery store.

The exclusion/elimination period is another fine print detail of LTCI policies people should better familiarize themselves with. An exclusion/elimination period is a period of time that must pass before someone can start receiving payment for services. It is an imposed period of time people will pay for their own long-term care expenses until the insurance company steps in to pay. Basically, the exclusion or elimination period is similar to that of a deductible in a health insurance plan.

While the deductible of a health insurance plan is a monetary amount that must be met before an insurance company will fully pay for service, the exclusion/elimination of a LTCI plan is measured in days. The unfortunate difference here is that the deductible of a health insurance plan can be met immediately by paying the deductible. Conversely, the exclusion/elimination of a LTCI plan must be met in a period of time – days.  With exclusion/elimination periods frequently ranging between 15 and 90 days (90 days is the most common length), this could be a very trying time for both patient and family members supporting their loved one.

It is not by mistake or without intent that LTCI insurance premiums and exclusion/elimination periods have an inverse relationship. The shorter the elimination period, the higher the premium will be. While the longer the elimination period, the lower the premium will be.

When considering the purchase of a LTCI policy or needing to open a claim, make sure you understand the following elements of a LTCI policy: What they will/will not cover

  1. What is the daily/weekly amount of coverage?
  2. What are their terms/qualifications for opening a claim?
  3. What is the “elimination” or “exclusion” period?

Undoubtedly, LTCI can be a wonderful thing, and thousands of policy holders would tell you truthfully that their policy has been a lifesaver during their time of need.

Judson Haims is the owner of Visiting Angels Home Care in Eagle County. He is an advocate for our elderly and available to answer questions. His contact information is VisitingAngels.com/comtns and 970-328-5526.

Loose booster vaccine advice has Garfield County employers awaiting guidance on whether it might be required in some sectors

People line up outside the Garfield County Public Health Building in Glenwood Springs to receive their COVID booster vaccines.
Carrie Godes/Garfield County Public Health

Local employers who fall under state or federal COVID-19 vaccine requirements for their workers, or who are requiring them voluntarily, are awaiting word on whether that should extend to booster shots.

“We have not received that directive from the state at this time,” Annick Pruett, community relations director for Grand River Health in Rifle, said Thursday.

“I do know many of our staff have received the boosters already,” she said. That includes nearly all of Grand River Health’s physicians, she said.

Grand River and other state-licensed hospitals and health-care facilities, including Valley View Hospital in Glenwood Springs, fall under the state’s health-care worker vaccine mandate.

Federal agencies, including the U.S. Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management which both have a large workforce locally, fall under the federal mandate.

And, many other area public and private employers have either required vaccines, or strongly advised that their employees be vaccinated against COVID-19.

But, with the clock ticking past six months since many people received their second doses in the spring, one question is whether the booster dose will also be required.

Updated CDC guidance sent out last week recommends Moderna and Pfizer recipients get a booster shot six months after the second dose.

Those who received the one-shot Johnson & Johnson vaccine more than two months ago can now get a booster shot. And, it doesn’t even have to be J&J. It can be either Moderna or Pfizer.

Regardless of the initial vaccine someone received, CDC says its OK to “mix and match” with another type of vaccine for the booster dose.

Under that guidance, priority is still given to people 65 years and older, residents of long-term care facilities, people ages 18 to 64 with underlying medical conditions and people ages 18 to 64 who live or work in places where COVID-19 exposure is heightened.

In Colorado, though, pretty much anyone who thinks they need a booster dose can arrange to get one at any vaccine site that’s offering the COVID-19 vaccine, according to followup guidance from state public health officials.

Recently, anyone who is entered in the MyColorado app database with a COVID-19 vaccination record and is six months out from their last dose likely received a text advising they’re due for a booster.

“People who are eligible should get their booster dose as soon as possible, especially as we approach the holidays and look forward to safely celebrating with our families and friends,” Dr. Eric France, chief medical officer for the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, said in an Oct. 21 news release.

Valley View Hospital hosted a booster clinic on Wednesday, administering shots to approximately 900 people, VVH Chief Community Relations Officer Stacey Gavrell said.

“It was a strong and busy clinic,” she said. “We targeted individuals per the CDC guidance for the clinic, essentially asking people to self-assess themselves relative to these guidelines and their personal eligibility.”

Gavrell said Valley View’s vaccination team will continue to gauge demand for boosters, and said future COVID booster clinics are likely.

“We are not experiencing the supply chain issue in regards to getting the vaccine as we did previously,” she said.

Boosting protection

Garfield County Public Health Specialist Mason Hohstadt said the county’s latest spike in new COVID-19 cases points up the importance for older residents in particular who are already vaccinated to get the booster.

The county now breaks out new cases by vaccination status. For the seven-day period ending Oct. 24, 143 of the 173 new cases confirmed were among people who were unvaccinated.

Just 30 of those cases were “breakthrough cases” among vaccinated people, according to the county’s COVID-19 data page.

While the majority of recent breakthrough cases have been among working-age people in the 30-39 and 40-49 age groups, 47% of breakthrough cases involve people over age 70, Hohstadt said.

“That does show the waning efficacy of the vaccine for those individuals in particular, which is why the booster shots are a necessary and needed thing,” he said.

To date, 73% of Garfield County’s eligible population has received at least one vaccine dose, and 66% is fully vaccinated.

Broken out by age, the county’s 70-79 age group has the highest vaccination rate (full), at 89%, followed closely by the 80+ and 60-69 age groups at 80%.

The remainder of the age group vaccination rates are as follows:

50-59 — 67%

40-49 — 64%

30-39 — 58%

19-29 — 59%

16-18 — 57%

12-15 — 54%

Anyone who is six months out from their last dose should seriously consider getting a booster, Hohstadt said.

“All of the things we expected the vaccine to do, it is doing, including waning efficacy,” he said.

Garfield County Public Health continues to offer vaccination clinics, including booster doses on request, during regular weekly clinic times.

The next clinics are 9 a.m.-4 p.m. Wednesdays, Nov. 3, 10 and 17 at the Glenwood Springs office, 2014 Blake Ave.; and Thursdays, Nov. 4 and 18 during the same hours in Rifle, 195 W. 14th St.

Vaccines are also administered at Valley View, Grand River Health, Mountain Family Health Centers, Glenwood Medical Associates and most private pharmacies.

Though clearance for the COVID-19 vaccine to be administered to children ages 5-11 is expected sometime in November, Garfield County Public Health spokeswoman Carrie Godes said it may not be available for that age group in Garfield County until December.

Senior Reporter/Managing Editor John Stroud can be reached at 970-384-9160 or jstroud@postindependent.com.

Valley View Hospital follows on heels of state’s health care worker vaccine mandate with staff requirement

Valley View Hospital employees look on as protesters gather outside of the hospital on Monday evening to rally against the mandate requiring workers in health care facilities be vaccinated.
Chelsea Self / Post Independent

Valley View Hospital in Glenwood Springs has issued a formal policy requiring its staff to be vaccinated against COVID-19, a move underway before the Colorado Health Board’s decision Monday mandating vaccines for health care workers statewide.

“As a health care organization, it is paramount that we do everything we can to provide high quality care to our patients in a safe environment,” Valley View CEO Dr. Brian Murphy said in a statement Tuesday.

“The COVID-19 vaccines offer the most effective way to protect our patients and staff from the virus and variants,” he said. “After careful consideration, we are announcing this policy and taking the next important step to end the pandemic.”

Protesters rally outside of Valley View Hospital on Monday evening for freedom of choice regarding vaccine mandates, as the state Board of Health issued a decision requiring workers in health care facilities be vaccinated.
Chelsea Self / Post Independent
A man in a Jeep shows his support for the freedom of choice rally against mandated vaccines outside of Valley View Hospital on Monday evening.
Chelsea Self / Post Independent

The new policy, which also came in response to the recent full FDA approval for the Pfizer vaccine, will require full vaccination for all hospital staff by Nov. 1, Murphy said.

The state Board of Health, during an emergency meeting late Monday, approved its requirement that all staff of licensed health care facilities under its oversight receive the COVID-19 vaccine.

The move came at the request of Gov. Jared Polis, who asked the board to consider rules requiring health care facilities, such as hospitals, community medical clinics, hospice care providers and nursing homes, to mandate employee vaccines.

The state rule affects about 3,800 facilities across the state. It’s estimated about 30% of the state’s health care workforce remains unvaccinated, according to a news release issued by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment on Monday evening.

Murphy said in a follow-up interview Tuesday that about 13.5% of Valley View’s 1,200 employees — roughly 168 workers — remain unvaccinated.

That number changes daily, especially since the new mandate was issued, he said.

A driver on Grand Avenue gives a thumbs down to protesters rallying against a mandate requiring workers in health care facilities be vaccinated.
Chelsea Self / Post Independent

Likewise, Grand River Health in Rifle is crafting a policy in response to the state order, Chief Medical Officer Dr. Kevin Coleman said.

Coleman said when they started having conversations with staff members two months ago in anticipation of the state order, about 70% of staff were vaccinated. That percentage has now increased to almost 82%, he said.

“I think people at least understand why we’re going to require the vaccine and why the state would require the vaccine for health care workers,” Coleman said.

Decision sparks protests

But the decision hasn’t come without some pushback across Colorado. In Glenwood Springs, about 100 people, including several Valley View Hospital nurses and supporters, gathered outside the hospital and along Grand Avenue Monday evening to protest the vaccine mandate.

Similar protests occurred in Rifle on Friday and in Grand Junction over the weekend.

Nicole Atencio of Gypsum is a nurse at Valley View but is currently on maternity leave.

She said she chose not to be vaccinated while she was pregnant over concerns about potential unknown impacts for pregnant women and nursing mothers.

“I’m not against vaccines,” she said. “But I didn’t feel comfortable getting it while I was pregnant, and now I’m breastfeeding. At this point, I wouldn’t consider it. Down the road I may, but I’m just making the best decision for my family right now.”

Valley View nurses Ashley Mason and Sydney Borem, who were also at the protest, and many of their co-workers who’ve also chosen for different reasons not to get vaccinated, now face the prospect of being fired if they don’t.

Protesters gather outside of Valley View Hospital to rally against the mandate requiring workers in health care facilities be vaccinated.
Chelsea Self / Post Independent

“We’re already taking the proper precautions, and we will continue to do so to protect our patients,” Mason said of the required use of personal protective equipment and other protocols within the hospital.

“This is about having the choice about what we put in our bodies,” she said. “It shouldn’t be mandated.”

Added Borem, “As health care professionals, we advise our patients of the risk of vaccines, medications, surgeries, anything, and it’s their choice whether to proceed. As soon as we sit in that chair we are no longer an employee, we’re patients.”

Gina Shaw of Basalt said her daughter is about to quit nursing school because of the new mandate. Shaw said she believes the requirement violates a person’s right to make their own health care decisions.

Protesters gather outside of Valley View Hospital to rally against the mandate to require workers in health care facilities be vaccinated.
Chelsea Self / Post Independent

“A year ago these nurses were heroes working with COVID patients. And now they’re a danger to society?” she asked. “We keep hearing about how the hospitals are overwhelmed, but now we won’t have the staff we need for them.”

Tricia Brady of Rifle also attended the rally in support of nurses and other health care workers. She said she, too, worries about there being a staffing shortage if hospital and nursing home workers are required to be vaccinated against their will.

“I’m here to support the medical professionals,” Brady said. “And I don’t want to see this mandatory vaccine program spreading to other professional fields.”

She added that she believes the vaccine is yet untested in terms of its effectiveness against the delta variant, which is the most common form of the COVID-19 virus now.

Protesters gather outside of Valley View Hospital on Monday evening to rally against the mandate requiring workers in health care facilities be vaccinated.
Chelsea Self / Post Independent

“At some point it’s just going to become less effective, and we’ll have to continue to get dose after dose,” Brady said. “That’s my concern.”

Statewide rules

The state Health Board ruled 6-1 that nurses and other health care workers who interact with patients will be required to obtain a first dose of the vaccine by Oct. 31.

The state rule does not apply to doctors’ offices or urgent care centers. After Oct. 31, facilities will also no longer be allowed to hire unvaccinated workers.

During a two-hour virtual hearing Monday attended by at least 1,000 people, about twice as many people spoke against the mandate as spoke in favor, The Denver Post reported.

Several people suggested workers would end up quitting rather than be vaccinated, worsening staffing shortages.

Workers, including locally at Valley View and Grand River Health facilities in Rifle, will be able to seek medical or religious exemptions under the state mandate.

A protester gathers with others outside of Valley View Hospital to rally against the mandate to require workers in health care facilities be vaccinated.
Chelsea Self / Post Independent

“Valley View offers vaccine exemptions for specific medical contraindications and deeply held religious beliefs within parameters allowed by the recent CDPHE order,” the hospital said in its statement.

Murphy said exemption requests would be handled on a case-by-case basis. Unless a worker receives an exemption, refusal to be vaccinated will be considered a resignation.

“We want to keep the employees who are valuable to us,” he said. “That’s why we’re trying to make an internal effort to try to compel all of our incredibly valuable employees to see why, while we respect personal liberties, that fundamentally being in health care it’s on our shoulders to do everything we can to protect the public.”

Grand River’s Coleman offered that, whether it’s from fatigue or not wanting to get vaccinated, he also anticipates losing staff.

“I think they have the option of leaving — I think that’s gonna play out in every hospital in Colorado with state mandates,” Coleman said. “We have to be prepared for that in that respect, that people have the right to say, I’m not going to work under these conditions, and we need to plan accordingly.”

Consensus opinion

Ultimately, the decision is meant to protect hospital workers and patients, said Dr. David Brooks, chief medical officer for Valley View.

“Science has shown that the vaccines are safe and effectively reduce the risk of becoming infected, spreading the virus to others and becoming severely ill or dying from the disease,” Brooks said. “We will work with staff who are not vaccinated to answer their questions and address their concerns so they can feel confident in receiving the vaccine.”

Added Valley View Chief Nursing Officer Dawn Sculco, “Our team members have seen firsthand the devastating effects of the COVID-19 virus. They have persevered and demonstrated an incredible commitment to caring for our patients and serving our community. By getting vaccinated, our staff will continue to lead the way in turning the tide on this pandemic.”

Grand River Health Registered Nurse and Quality Assurance Analyst Jane Vincent said she also agrees with vaccination mandates.

“The concept would be that when you care for somebody at the bedside who suffers from the process of going through COVID, it has a real impact on your own decision making and feeling of responsibility to do what the scientific recommendation is,” she said.

For any workers receiving an exemption, accommodations will be developed according to an individuals’ specific role, according to Valley View’s statement. That could include enhanced PPE while in any Valley View location, the release stated.

Senior Reporter/Managing Editor John Stroud can be reached at 970-384-9160 or jstroud@postindependent.com.

West Garfield County/Citizen Telegram Reporter Ray K. Erku contributed to this report. He can be reached at 612-423-5273 or rerku@postindependent.com.

As restrictions loosen, some people are hesitant about returning to pre-pandemic life

Summit County resident Stephanie Trasatti looks out her window in Dillon on Thursday, May 13. She is one of many people who are feeling hesitant about pandemic restrictions loosening in the community.
Photo by Ashley Low

While many are breathing a sigh of relief at the loosening of local restrictions, some are feeling hesitant and are questioning whether the county is moving too quickly.

On May 4, the county officially moved into level green, removing the 6-foot distancing rule and capacity restrictions. On Friday, May 14, the county was working to update its public health order to better align with the state’s in addition to new guidance on mask-wearing from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

As the county quickly drops restrictions that have become a part of everyday life for the past 14 months, some residents, including Stephanie Trasatti, are taking pause and wondering if this is the right move.

Trasatti is a nurse who works at St. Anthony Summit Medical Center and has helped take care of COVID-19 patients. Because of her job, and because she has underlying health conditions, she said she has significantly reduced her social circle over the past 14 months and limited how much she’s in public.

“I feel like I’ve also had to cut out certain people, friends who are not as cautious as maybe some other people, which has made my friends group very small,” Trasatti said. “(They’re) people I trust to hang out with. But that, in turn with the restrictions everywhere, has left me sitting at home a lot and totally changed my entire lifestyle.”

Since the pandemic began, Trasatti has canceled four trips to visit family and said she felt anxiety about attending her brother’s wedding. She said she continues to feel hesitant about traveling and being in large groups of people.

Now that life is slowly returning to normal, Trasatti said she’s nervous about transitioning to life post-pandemic, especially as mask requirements loosen.

“Almost going out without a mask on, you just feel so exposed and so vulnerable. And COVID’s not gone, so it makes it difficult,” Trasatti said. “You want to trust that they’re doing this for a reason, and they’ve done their research, but I feel like masks have almost become a security blanket, and it just makes you anxious because you could get sick. Your risks of getting sick are a lot higher being around people, and you don’t have that shield.”

Summit County resident Stephanie Trasatti works from her home in Dillon on Thursday, May 13. She is one of many people who are feeling anxious about pandemic restrictions loosening in the community.
Photo by Ashley Low

Breckenridge resident Patricia Walker said she also isn’t sure whether the county is heading in the right direction.

“I’m not too sure we’re handling the relaxations very well,” Walker said. “I personally — as much as I hate wearing this mask, and trust me, I hate wearing this mask — I would rather wear this mask until (COVID-19) is completely gone.”

Walker said her life dramatically changed, too. Walker typically sees her husband six months of the year because he travels for work. When the pandemic hit, both of them were in different parts of the country and neither was willing to travel to see the other. Until recently, Walker hadn’t seen her husband since January 2020.

Though she’s visited a couple of restaurants, socialized with friends who are vaccinated and traveled some, Walker said she’s still hesitant to be in public without a mask.

Rachel Miller, mental health supervisor at the Family & Intercultural Resource Center, said she primarily sees individuals who are struggling with one of two responses: in some instances, Miller said individuals experience physical symptoms of anxiety and might be having a trauma-like response when reentering society. In other instances, individuals are trying to forge ahead and are questioning what normal looks like for them.

Miller said it’s important to establish practices that remind you you’re safe in the present moment. Activities like exercising, being outside, gardening, meditation, meaningful connection with loved ones and journaling are all coping strategies she suggested. Above all, Miller said it helps to validate feelings of stress in most cases.

“I just want to normalize that people are feeling that way, and sometimes just normalizing it is what we need to hear to move through it,” Miller said. “You’re not the only person feeling that way.”

Summit County resident Stephanie Trasatti takes her dog for a walk in Dillon on Thursday, May 13. She is one of many people who are feeling anxious about pandemic restrictions loosening in the community.
Photo by Ashley Low

On Thursday, May 13, Building Hope Summit County hosted a virtual event that focused on anxiety reentering society. Jane Hahn of Grit Therapy led the event and provided some tips and coping strategies for attendees to try as they begin participating in social activities again.

Some of her strategies included starting small, like mingling in a small group of people outside, and getting a “COVID reentry buddy,” or another person who feels similarly to you so that the two of you can try activities together.

Hahn also suggested separating caution and fear, setting boundaries with family and friends about what you are and are not OK with, limiting news intake, participating in virtual social events and going to therapy if anxiety is impacting your sleep or appetite.

At a glance

Tips for managing reentry anxiety

• Start small: Socialize with a small group of people outside before attempting to socialize in large groups or indoors

• Get a reentry buddy: This person could be someone who has similar feelings as you who you can reenter society with

• Separate caution and fear: Are you staying home out of necessity or because of anxious or fearful feelings?

• Stay connected: Continue participating in virtual social events

• Get help: Go to therapy if negative feelings are disrupting sleep or causing loss of appetite

Carbondale women form Shot Whisperers: an organized effort to help valley residents get their COVID-19 vaccine

Immunization Coordinator Laurie Cohen holds a vial of the Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine in the Community Health Services building in Aspen on Wednesday, Dec. 23, 2020. (Kelsey Brunner/The Aspen Times)

Once the second round of the COVID-19 vaccine is administered, Niki Delson said the relief and gratitude people feel is totally tangible.

It’s one year into the pandemic and some people are feeling burnt out on quarantine, but finishing off the double dose of the vaccination, Delson said, brightens the light at the end of the tunnel.

“The feeling of people after they get their vaccine it’s almost like you want to raise your hand and say, ‘Hallelujah!’ …you can see in people’s eyes…a kind of sense of relief that maybe life can return to some normalcy and you can hug somebody in the future,” Delson said.

Delson is co-chair for the Carbondale Age-Friendly Community Initiative (CAFCI) as well as one-third of the Carbondale Shot Whisperers team. The two other women who make up the trio are Nicolette Toussaint, a retired journalist and steering committee member at CAFCI, and Ryn Calhoon, a registered nurse and member of the Carbondale Emergency Task Force. Calhoon said each of the women was trying to find a way to help elderly community members get their vaccines, and when they stumbled upon each other they decided it would be best to join efforts.

“I recall pretty clearly how this happened…Nicolette posted on Carbondale’s Mutual Aid Facebook group, ‘Boy I’m sure seeing people having some difficulty getting vaccinated.’ So I called Nicolette and Niki and said ‘Girls, I think we’re all doing the same thing, let’s coordinate ourselves,’” Calhoon said.

Toussaint said the women had realized that online appointments and phone calls were not the most effective way to reach the older demographic of valley residents, the people who arguably had some of the highest needs for the vaccine. It was her personal frustration with the process that inspired her to start helping direct others on how they could expedite their own vaccination timelines, and where to look for availability.

“I’m watching everybody get shots because Colorado said, ‘OK, if you’re over 70 you can get a shot.’ I’m 69 and 1/2 and I have three underlying conditions, and I have a 90-year-old husband who’s had three strokes…I’m an at-home caregiver and none of that qualified me for a shot,” Toussaint said.

Karin Bannerot, a resident of the valley out in Missouri Heights, said she had a similar issue qualifying for the vaccine. Bannerot is a registered nurse and works multiple jobs one of which is being a child care health consultant at the state company and at two childcares in the valley. Bannerot said besides working with children part-time, she also has Type 1 Diabetes but neither of those things allowed her to qualify for the vaccine.

“I could not get vaccinated in Pitkin or Garfield County even though I do my preschool teaching for Garfield Teachers and the SkiCo which is Pitkin County, no one was claiming me…the pitfalls are if you’re self-employed, which I am, and…I felt like i was a woman without the backing of an employer per say because I don’t work full-time in any of my jobs,” Bannerot said.

Since Bannerot is trained as a nurse she ended up getting her vaccine by stopping by a clinic at the Eagle County Community Center, and saying although she wasn’t on the list, she was willing to wait in case there were any no-shows to get vaccinated. It turned out that the Medical Moderator for that clinic wasn’t able to come that day, and asked if Bannerot was able to step in for that afternoon.

“I said I’ll clear my calendar for this afternoon, and I did. So I got my first shot Jan. 8, filled in quickly…so then Feb. 5 was my second shot so I volunteered to work that clinic all afternoon again,” Bannerot said.

Delson was the one who helped Bannerot’s husband, who is 66 and has chronic lung issues, receive his vaccine. Bannerot said she had been exchanging resource information with Delson for a while when Delson reached out and told her Mountain Family Health Center in Glenwood needed 10 people and they had one more vial of the vaccine. Delson said word of mouth and knowing where to look for these extra doses is how many are seizing the opportunity to get vaccinated.

“It’s just finding out who did not use up all of their vaccines. I mean maybe people couldn’t come in for an appointment and so they still have some left over but no appointments scheduled for that extra. That’s how competitive it is to be able to get vaccinated,” Delson said.

Calhoon said although finding these clinics with vaccines to spare is challenging, everyone she has talked to told her that once they had arrived at the clinic the process was incredibly easy. Toussaint agreed and said that when it was time for her husband to get his vaccine at Valley View it seemed like half the town of Carbondale was there, but the operation still ran very smoothly. Part of the confusion comes from medical professionals being overworked and having to juggle many tasks at once, Calhoon said.

“The Feds said ‘OK here’s the vaccine, you handle it state,’ and the state said, ‘OK counties you handle it.’ And everybody is doing it differently. It’s the same people who have been burdened with doing the contact tracing and organizing the testing that are now burdened with the vaccine aspect,” Calhoon said.

Delson, Toussaint and Calhoon all agreed that the healthcare workers in the Valley are doing a wonderful job, and with Shot Whisperers they just want to make information more accessible and help streamline the process to get people who need the vaccine where they need to be.

Vaccine access or joining Shot Whisperers info

For information about vaccine access in Garfield County visit this website

To schedule a vaccine at Valley View Hospital (VVH) go here. Valley View said, “If no vaccine product is available then no appointments will be scheduled.” If you do not have internet access call the VVH community hotline at 970-384-7632.

All three Shot Whisperers are currently based in Carbondale but said they are looking to expand and bring other volunteers in from different parts of the Valley, especially as more vaccines are being delivered. To help in their efforts to share COVID-19 resources or learn more about how you can get the vaccine, feel free to use their contact info as listed below.

Niki Delson: niki@agefriendlycarbondale.org / 707-496-3322

Nicolette Toussaint: thymetoblossom@gmail.com / 970-963-3674

Ryn Calhoon: cathycalhoon@gmail.com / 970-618-1257

jpeterson@postindependent.com

Garfield Public Health, state investigating possible COVID-19 variant case in Glenwood Springs school

Garfield County Public Health building in Glenwood Springs.
Chelsea Self/Glenwood Springs Post Independent

Garfield County Public Health and Roaring Fork Schools are cooperating with Colorado public health officials to investigate possible exposure at a Glenwood Springs school to coronavirus disease variant.

Local officials were made aware by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment that a Sopris Elementary student “and/or” staff member may have been exposed to one of the different COVID variants earlier this month.

“The health department is working with a dedicated team at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE) to determine potential exposure and contain any further spread,” Garfield Public Health said in a Saturday morning press release.

“Public Health can confirm that no students or staff members in this cohort have reported symptoms to the health department, and the normal quarantine window has already ended,” the release stated. “Families of students in the impacted cohort have been contacted and school staff and the health department are continuing to monitor for any signs of COVID symptoms.”

Local public health officials and school administration have indicated that they are not aware of any students having symptoms during the past 14 days.

“While there is still a lot of uncertainty surrounding the different COVID variants, the greatest concern is the possibility of increased contagiousness,” the release said.

The CDC and CDPHE have requested additional contact tracing and testing for impacted individuals. Public Health is working directly with those families, according to the release.

Also in response, the staff at Sopris Elementary received their COVID-19 vaccinations on Friday, the county health release said.

“We know this news may raise additional questions and more information will be shared as soon as it is available,” the release stated.

Parents who have concerns can call 970-625-5200, extension 8135.

On Friday, Gov. Jared Polis announced that, beginning the week of Feb. 8, all in-person school staff and licensed child care providers are eligible to be vaccinated. All three school districts in Garfield County have submitted a list of those staff members, according to the release.

Summit County officials to change public health order, giving short-term lodging companies more leeway

Townhomes at the base of Peak 8 in Breckenridge are pictured Nov. 20. Many of the residences in Breckenridge are used as second homes and for short-term rentals. Photo by Jason Connolly / Jason Connolly Photography

Summit County officials will be releasing a new public health order next week to clarify how short-term lodging companies should go about confirming the number of households in one reservation.

Summit County Manager Scott Vargo announced the change at a Board of Health meeting Thursday, Jan. 14. Vargo said the new order likely won’t go into effect until Friday, Jan. 22, to allow for lodging companies to adjust.

The current order states that “owners and/or entities responsible for the booking and renting of short-term lodging units must confirm the identity of all renters upon arrival” to ensure that the group doesn’t violate the state’s public health order, which limits gatherings to two households under level orange restrictions.

The proposed language for the new order says short-term lodging companies must “confirm renters are aware of and are in compliance with gathering size limits” mandated by the state’s public health order.

The goal of the change is to simplify the process for confirming customers’ identities. Under the current order, short-term lodging companies are liable if a guest breaks public health rules. The change will put that liability on the guests instead.

“The change is trying to clarify what the expectation is and simplifying how property managers, property owners, are able to verify or confirm the folks that are renting those properties are aware of the rule and in compliance with the rules,” Vargo said.

The county also created a sample form for short-term lodging companies to give to guests ahead of arrival. The form requires the person who made the reservation to certify that they have reviewed the local and state public health order and are aware that a violation could mean a fine of up to $5,000 or up to 18 months in jail.

“They don’t have to use this form, but I would suspect that most will take advantage of something that’s been prepared or take the language from this form and plug it into whatever electronic system that they may be using or other check-in model that they’re taking advantage of,” Vargo said.

At a Board of Health meeting on Thursday, Jan. 14, Summit County Manager Scott Vargo presented a sample form for short-term lodging owners and managers to use to confirm that guests are aware of COVID-19 rules.
Screenshot from meeting

Commissioner Tamara Pogue said the goal of the change is to make the process as easy as possible for lodging companies.

“The idea is they’ll not be required to look for any more form of ID from their guests,” she said. “By asking their guests to sign the affidavit, it limits and mitigates some of the liability to the personal company if folks choose to misrepresent what is actually happening.”

County officials also hope the change will create some parity between what the county is doing for lodging companies and the rules for restaurants, which are not required to confirm the identity of guests unless they are five-star certified.

At the meeting, Vargo also said the county will not be making adjustments to alcohol-consumption rules for restaurants that are in the 5 Star Business Certification Program for at least a week.

Currently, all restaurants must cease the sale and consumption of alcohol at 9:30 p.m. However, some restaurant owners are pushing for the county to allow alcohol to be on a table until 10 p.m. at five-star certified restaurants.

Because the county is in the midst of a bump in cases due to the holidays, officials are putting a pause on making that change.

“Our recommendation from staff and from (Public Health Director Amy Wineland) is that we push and wait and see where do those numbers go?” Vargo said. “Do we start to settle back down? Or do we start to see that trend continuing to go up?”

Wineland said the county should know by Thursday, Jan. 21, whether the bump in cases has been suppressed.

Pogue said she hopes the county will be able to make the change sooner rather than later.

“I really don’t want to drag this on,” Pogue said. “I don’t think there’s great data to justify the change from the state’s restriction in this space.”

Free Covid-19 testing coming to Glenwood Springs starting Monday

A new free Covid-19 testing site is being set up in the Roaring Fork School District office parking lot in Glenwood Springs, and is to open Monday, Nov. 23.

A coalition of community partners, including Garfield County Public Health and the Roaring Fork School District, plan to bring free Covid-19 testing to a designated site in Glenwood Springs starting on Monday, Nov. 23.

The new Roaring Fork Valley drive-up Covid testing site is being set up in the parking lot between Glenwood Springs High School and the District Office, 1405 Grand Ave. (east of the student lot).

Hours are slated from 7–11 a.m., Monday through Friday, until further notice. No doctor referral is required, but appointments are necessary to be tested. Schedule an appointment here [www.rfvcovidtest.com].

The testing site is being organized by the same coalition of community partners that have been operating the free testing site in El Jebel at the Eagle County Community Center.

Testing turnaround time is approximately 48 hours.

“This is a service in collaboration with our state and local community partners to increase access to Covid testing in the Roaring Fork Valley,” reads a statement on the rfvcovidtest.com website. “Please remember that testing is not a substitute for an examination by your own primary care provider.”

According to the website, partners include the school district, the public health departments of Garfield, Eagle and Pitkin counties, the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Dr. Brooke Allen of Roaring Fork Neurology, the town of Basalt, Basalt Mayor Bill Kane, the Eagle County Community Center and MicrogenDx.

jstroud@postindependent.com

State steps in to move Garfield County to ’high risk’ orange level on Covid dial

Tighter restrictions on business activity and public and private gatherings are now in effect in Garfield County, after the state acted Thursday to move the county to the “high risk” category on the Covid-19 dial.

The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE) formally moved Garfield County into the orange, or “high-risk” category, based on the state’s metrics tool to determine pandemic restrictions.

County commissioners, in a special meeting with CDPHE Chief of Staff Mara Brosy-Wiwchar on Tuesday, made an appeal to remain in the yellow, or “concerned” category, saying it more accurately reflects the situation in Garfield County.

Not all of the restrictions that would normally come with the state’s orange level will be in effect for Garfield County, though, according to a news release from the county announcing the new limits.

Current variances will remain in place, including those for the Glenwood Hot Springs Resort and Iron Mountain Hot Springs, as well as the Glenwood Caverns Adventure Park.

Restaurants and retail shops are still allowed to operate at 50% capacity, though outdoor seating for restaurants is limited to 10 people, 6 feet apart. Places of worship may also continue to operate at the yellow level of 50% capacity, or up to 175 people, depending on building space.

However, restaurant liquor sales must end at 10 p.m. under the new restrictions.

The orange-level restrictions also limit public and private gatherings to no more than 10 people from no more than two households; in-person office occupancy of no more than 25%, with remote work encouraged; indoor and outdoor events are limited to 25% of posted occupancy, or 50 and 75 people, respectively, whichever is less.

Personal services are also limited to 25% occupancy, or 25 people, whichever is less.

And, organized recreational youth or adult indoor sports are not allowed. However, outdoor events may proceed with groups of 10 or less, as long as participants are practicing safe social distancing.

New variance requests are also prohibited until the county is back at the yellow level, according to the release.

Municipalities may also implement more stringent measures, but none less strict than those at the orange level.

County commissioners had argued that Garfield County has worked with the public and with businesses to promote the practices of mask-wearing, maintaining a safe distance from other people, hand-washing and using good hygiene.

Commissioner Tom Jankovsky warned that further limiting economic activity would be both financially damaging and unduly punitive.

“It is not right to put this on small businesses” he said. “Our public health department has done a good job of mitigation.”

Further, Jankovsky said there’s a psychological impact from being asked to roll back to tighter restrictions.

“We are having a mental health crisis,” he said.

Garfield County, with a population of roughly 58,000 people, on Thursday reported 395 new positive cases (equates to 659 per 100,000 people) from Nov. 5 to Nov. 18, and a test positivity rate of 12.4%. Orange status is in effect if a county experiences more than 175 to 350 cases per 100,000 people over a 14-day period. or a test positivity rate of no more than 15%.

Hospital capacity also remains at a comfortable level in the county, though hospital officials warn that can change quickly.

“Limiting the disease’s spread is encouraged by having residents practice safety guidelines of wearing masks, washing their hands often, limiting travel as much as possible, and above all, staying home when ill,” the release states.

The full list of restrictions and variances under level orange as it will be applied in Garfield County can be found on the county’s public health orders webpage, at www.garfield-county.com/public-health/executive-orders.