Head of RFTA defuses ﬁght over transit expansion plan
Ryan Summerlin February 7, 2013
BASALT – Roaring Fork Transportation Authority CEO Dan Blankenship made two executive decisions Tuesday night that could end a battle with a midvalley subdivision and clear the path for a key component of the bus agency’s expansion.
Blankenship pledged to residents of Sopris Village that RFTA won’t stage buses at a proposed park-and-ride adjacent to the subdivision and that it will urge Basalt to close access from that parking lot to Sopris Village Drive.
Blankenship’s concessions came at a Basalt Planning and Zoning Commission meeting that attracted about 30 residents of Sopris Village. They were unified against allowing traffic to come into the subdivision to either enter or exit RFTA’s 82-space parking lot, proposed for the former location of Mermaid’s restaurant. A second access to the parking lot is from East Valley Road.
During long negotiations with the subdivision, RFTA has offered to prohibit traffic from exiting left from the parking lot into the subdivision. That wasn’t enough for residents. They wanted all access to the parking lot from Sopris Village Drive eliminated.
“This is just too much impact on Sopris Village,” said Michael Meiners, president of the homeowners’ association. He expressed concern that commuters would cut through the subdivision from Willits Lane to get to the parking lot.
Subdivision resident Tim Forrest urged the Planning Commission to “stand up” for Sopris Village in the debate.
“If that (parking lot) wasn’t there, we wouldn’t object to RFTA,” Forrest said. “This is a poor design that’s been shoved down Sopris Village’s throat.”
Blankenship said it was a design RFTA never promoted, as far as the entrance-exit off Sopris Village Drive. Traffic engineers for Basalt town government recommended creating the access to the parking lot from Sopris Village Drive to lessen the danger to pedestrians leaving their vehicles to cross East Valley Road to get to the bus stop, according to Basalt Planning Director Susan Philp. Blankenship said RFTA would abide by whatever Basalt decides on the issue.
“It seems like (the parking lot) is one of the biggest bones of contention here,” Blankenship said. He defused the situation by deciding that RFTA will find a different location to stage buses that might be required for service at peak times or in case another bus has a mechanical issue.
“We’re going to move those buses somewhere else,” he said.
Later in the meeting, he said RFTA wouldn’t object to closing the access to the parking lot from Sopris Village Drive altogether.
Members of the Planning Commission needed little encouragement to recommend closing the access.
“It seems pretty simple to me,” said Planning Commission member Gary Wheeler. “I wouldn’t want people driving through my neighborhood, either.”
Board member Chris Touchette supported closing that access, as well, as long as RFTA enhances crosswalks and installs pedestrian signs on East Valley Road. People who park in the proposed parking lot will have to cross the busy road to get to and from bus stops.
The planning commission voted 7-0 to recommend that Basalt Town Council approve RFTA’s proposed parking lot, with the access closed at Sopris Village Drive and with the enhanced pedestrian amenities on East Village Road.
The issue will advance to the Town Council later this month.
RFTA officials stressed that they need all approvals from Basalt by the end of March so construction can begin in April. The $46 million expansion, partially funded by the federal government, is supposed to be finished by September. If it is late, Blankenship said, the Federal Transit Administration might be wary of awarding future grants to RFTA. The federal agency awarded $24 million for RFTA’s expansion.
The El Jebel parking lot is a small part of the project but that one RFTA officials deem critical for midvalley bus riders. Project manager Mike Hermes estimated the parking lot will cost around $750,000.